“We are spending the most money as a society educating the wealthiest people.” -- Ronald Ehrenberg, director of the Cornell University Higher Education Research Institute
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/05/21/rich-universi...
http://money.cnn.com/2015/04/28/pf/college/ivy-league-low-in...
https://www.bostonglobe.com/magazine/2015/04/09/what-like-po...
http://www.forbes.com/sites/maggiemcgrath/2013/11/27/the-cha...
http://www.cnbc.com/2015/09/16/top-1-of-harvard-grads-richer...
"A median 16 percent of their 2012-13 enrollees received Pell Grants, a form of federal aid only available to low-income students, according to an analysis of federal data."
What's low-income? If you define low-income as the bottom 20% of income earnings, that would be very close to proportional representation. That's outstanding, given all the confounding factors connecting performance and income.
- http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2013/9/4/freshman-survey-a...
less than 2% of families earn more than $250,000 / year.
- http://www.politifact.com/florida/statements/2012/apr/10/bar...
The point I'm making is that inequality in colleges is due to better preparation by higher-earning families and not some conspiratorial old-boys club. The hypothetical "some poor person, who went to a shitty college, that's even smarter" the original commenter referred to would have had as fair a shot as any of their caliber to get into the top schools. It's the poor precocious 5 year old that doesn't get read to every night and falls behind because both parents are working late at minimum wage jobs that defines the difficulty of escaping poverty through education. Top schools get to the table wayyy too late to heap the blame on them.
Including: Harvard MIT Stanford Princeton Columbia
etc.