Re:Re:work – tools and lessons to make work better
by natep on Thursday October 29, 2015 @03:02PM
(#10473430)
Is that an actual quote within your quotation marks? Or are you creating your own straw man and attributing it to them?
Re:Re:work – tools and lessons to make work better
by mmanfrin on Thursday October 29, 2015 @03:07PM
(#10473466)
Here at Google, we're independent, free-thinkers, and we're
definitely not influenced by the militant leftist crowd
that plagues the Bay Area
Stopped reading here. You might have had a good argument had you not just completely trangented off in an unnecessary political jab.
Re:Re:work – tools and lessons to make work better
by delinka on Thursday October 29, 2015 @02:56PM
(#10473377)
"We're all the same person in every way and everyone is as talented and special as everyone else."
That pretty much sounds like "hire whomever walks through the door."
[dead]
>There's a lot of room for unconscious bias to color the information. Research tells us that subtle indicators - names, clubs, addresses, school, previous employment, race, parental status, socio-economic status, etc - may unconsciously affect expectations and assessment of a candidate.
"Here at Google, we're independent, free-thinkers, and we're definitely not influenced by the militant leftist crowd that plagues the Bay Area. That's why you're not allowed to take anything about a person into consideration before hiring them. Literally nothing. We're all the same person in every way and everyone is as talented and special as everyone else. Everything is a bias and should be expunged from your evaluation process."
These companies will let the PC police ruin them.