News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Counterintuitive economics of a chess tournament. Parent comment

Re:Counterintuitive economics of a chess tournament by CJefferson on Wednesday October 14, 2015 @04:30AM (#10385545)
What are you referring to? The phrase 'Top female prize' appears nowhere on the linked page.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Counterintuitive economics of a chess tournament by slyall on Wednesday October 14, 2015 @04:34AM (#10385550)
They are referring to this page:

https://millionairechess.com/prizes

Also prizes in each division for "Top senior prize (65+)" and "Best child under 13 yrs old"

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Counterintuitive economics of a chess tournament by yitchelle on Wednesday October 14, 2015 @04:58AM (#10385628)
Prizes for best dressed? Is this referring to some chess maneuvers, or the actual clothes the players are wearing?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Counterintuitive economics of a chess tournament by komaromy on Wednesday October 14, 2015 @08:22AM (#10386170)
The actual clothes. Chess players are notoriously poorly dressed and the organizers want to be able to eventually package this for television, so they give some incentive for improvement.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Counterintuitive economics of a chess tournament by throwaeayBan on Wednesday October 14, 2015 @04:40AM (#10385567)
Thank you. Exactly what I was refering to (was linked in article).
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Counterintuitive economics of a chess tournament by CJefferson on Wednesday October 14, 2015 @06:18AM (#10385834)
Then why specifically single out the female award, instead of the Under 13 and 65+. Why are you not demanding a '13-65' award?
[ Parent | on HN ]