News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

throwaeayBan

Re:Counterintuitive economics of a chess tournament on Wednesday October 14, 2015 @04:47AM (#10385587)
Please note that I am against extra prizes (because of private bits or skin colour) in open tournaments. Women can have their titles, their own tournaments, their own prizes ( in their tournaments) as long as men can have same. I just request everyone be treated same in tournament where everyone is alowed and fights free for all ( if tournament is split into two separate groups - prizes can be different too)
Re:Counterintuitive economics of a chess tournament on Wednesday October 14, 2015 @04:43AM (#10385577)
Mind providing examples of males having prize when outnumbered (preferably not once but consistently) or where men get headstart (like in marathon I can't remember name of, where women get head start)? Because I will be angry about that too. It kills competition, it kills meritocracy.
Re:Counterintuitive economics of a chess tournament on Wednesday October 14, 2015 @04:40AM (#10385567)
Thank you. Exactly what I was refering to (was linked in article).