Re:Counterintuitive economics of a chess tournament
by throwaeayBan on Wednesday October 14, 2015 @04:40AM
(#10385567)
Thank you. Exactly what I was refering to (was linked in article).
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Counterintuitive economics of a chess tournament
by CJefferson on Wednesday October 14, 2015 @06:18AM
(#10385834)
Then why specifically single out the female award, instead of the Under 13 and 65+. Why are you not demanding a '13-65' award?