News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The State of LTE in September 2015 by snaily on Thursday October 01, 2015 @12:13AM (#10309189)
> It is a large country and has existing infrastructure.

The latter part is the real elephant in the room here - the former reason is by now a cliché putdown when it comes to infrastructure investment in the US. Kazahkstan and Uruguay are not small, even less dense than the US, and poorer - yet have better LTE coverage.

Re:The State of LTE in September 2015 by rdtsc on Thursday October 01, 2015 @12:51AM (#10309291)
But they fall in the other category -- probably didn't have an existing infrastructure already. So no backward compatibility worries, no need to throw away an existing investment if it already makes money.
Re:The State of LTE in September 2015 by Synaesthesia on Thursday October 01, 2015 @07:28AM (#10310398)
Same with South Africa. We're a relatively poor country, very large and sparsely populated, but doing quite well on the LTE scale, although we are known as cellphone mad over here.