News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Intel's "cripple AMD" function by rbanffy on Sunday January 03, 2010 @02:57PM (#1028999)
Better yet: make it writable.

That way the OS could change it per process/thread/context and the code would be happy.

Re:Intel's "cripple AMD" function by wmf on Sunday January 03, 2010 @03:56PM (#1029122)
VIA has a writable vendor string which they have used to reveal this type of shenanigans in the past.
Re:Intel's "cripple AMD" function by rbanffy on Sunday January 03, 2010 @11:17PM (#1029750)
I always liked those guys. The über-486 Centaur built was briiliant design and out-of-the-box thinking from top to bottom.

Weren't the VIAs able to trounce Xeons in some crypto stuff?

Re:Intel's "cripple AMD" function by wmf on Sunday January 03, 2010 @11:48PM (#1029780)
Weren't the VIAs able to trounce Xeons in some crypto stuff?

Yes, since they had crypto instructions and nobody else did. Now I would expect Westmere to be faster.

Re:Intel's "cripple AMD" function by spicyj on Sunday January 03, 2010 @07:29PM (#1029396)
From the end of the article:

It is possible to change the CPUID of AMD processors by using the AMD virtualization instructions. I hope that somebody will volunteer to make a program for this purpose. This will make it easy for anybody to check if their benchmark is fair and to improve the performance of software compiled with the Intel compiler on AMD processors.