Re:Mobile browser traffic is 2X bigger than app traffic, and...
by pjc50 on Sunday September 27, 2015 @08:06AM
(#10286246)
Back in the early days of webmail, when IE6 was new and we had 28.8k modems, someone almost certainly said that. 20 years ago we used Eudora, PINE, Netscape's mail client, or (if you were really unfortunate) Outlook Express.
Re:Mobile browser traffic is 2X bigger than app traffic, and...
by pjmlp on Sunday September 27, 2015 @10:15AM
(#10286562)
Still use Thunderbird. All web clients suck, including Gmail.
Re:Mobile browser traffic is 2X bigger than app traffic, and...
by tluyben2 on Sunday September 27, 2015 @08:30AM
(#10286294)
Pine -> Mutt -> Webmail for me. Those desktop clients were(are?) horrible. For iPhone/iPad I do like Inbox though.
Re:Mobile browser traffic is 2X bigger than app traffic, and...
by marcosdumay on Sunday September 27, 2015 @09:12AM
(#10286385)
POP was horrible, IMAP made things much better, but the web clients had already won.
A modern desktop client is much better than a modern webmail client when it's available. It's interesting that desktop clients have been continualy improving, while web clients have been continualy getting worse.
Anyway, both have their use.
> Remember when everyone thought web based email couldn't possibly work for them because of feature Z?
No, I've always used web-based email clients. Did a software developer really say this?