News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A review of probability theory by mitko on Saturday January 02, 2010 @11:34AM (#1027342)
Make no mistake - this is indeed quite deep. To be able to assimilate it well you will need at least knowledge of Analysis, Measure Theory, and good mathematical maturity.

I was able to read only part 1: Foundations, and these are my impressions. Definitely goes into my Bookmarks, so that I can read the rest...

Edit: The title was changed from "Probability Theory 101 (by Fields medallist Terry Tao)".

Re:A review of probability theory by leibniz on Saturday January 02, 2010 @12:52PM (#1027416)
Well, the hacker news feature a lot of programming-related stuff that is certainly 'above' the (average) blog post level (in the whole blogosphere). I know of no better meta-filter than hacker news for blog entries attracting a hacker's mindset. Certainly, the appreciation for mathematical thinking as well as mathematical methods plays a big role in this (analytic) mind set.

While the novice programmer might not get (the content and purpose of) python vs. ruby comparisons and the like, readers with a weak background in math will not find this probability entry useful (or too 'difficult').

However, for a certain subset of all hacker news readers, which are looking to dig deeper, it is a very nice resource.

Hacker news, to me, is especially useful since it provides links which are well distributed in terms of this 'entry level'.

Re:A review of probability theory by pvg on Saturday January 02, 2010 @01:04PM (#1027435)
The problem was not 'is this appropriate for HN' but 'the title is wildly misleading'.
Re:A review of probability theory by mitko on Saturday January 02, 2010 @01:19PM (#1027464)
I agree that this is of great value to HN, and especially to me.
Re:A review of probability theory by nova on Saturday January 02, 2010 @12:00PM (#1027366)
Yes. I think this exceeds the capacity of the blog medium.
Re:A review of probability theory by jfarmer on Saturday January 02, 2010 @12:38PM (#1027398)
I don't, it's just not for the lay audience.
Re:A review of probability theory by est on Saturday January 02, 2010 @03:20PM (#1027597)
> exceeds the capacity of the blog medium.

What's the better alternative?