News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The HTTP/2 implementation by dc_gregory on Thursday September 17, 2015 @05:42PM (#10236258)
Realistically, how many sites load those assets synchronously and how many sites need them loaded to provide the main functionality? Its a stretch to write off http/2 just for that!
Re:The HTTP/2 implementation by ldng on Friday September 18, 2015 @03:48AM (#10237960)
I did not write off HTTP2, I just said that it is not has interesting as marketed. It's great for some usecase like tiled maps for instance. Not worth the trouble for other usecase. That's all. Akamaï already demonstrated so, not long ago.
Re:The HTTP/2 implementation by dc_gregory on Sunday September 20, 2015 @07:26PM (#10249619)
I feel like it simplifies workflow, site design etc; serving your content from several domains is a hack and a half. I can see your point for non-greenfield dev, can't say there is a large amount of motivation to switch it out (aside from new toys!!!).