https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3mW4w0Y1OXE
It's a "Vaultz Tiger Pencil Box". Here's a video review of it:
It clearly did not. (There are pictures linked elsewhere in this comment thread, so you can see.) What happened is that a bunch of complete idiots thought it looked like a bomb, only because they have no idea what a bomb looks like, and they are additionally ignorant of their own ignorance.
I assume that you meant to google image search IED. Doing so, I see one image with an exposed PCB. I see several images with cell phones. One shows a Coke can. Are we to believe that an exposed Coke can also "looks like a bomb"? Or should we maybe believe that showing up in a Google Image search for a particular term is not sufficient to "look like" something?
Certainly IEDs can have exposed PCBs. So do hard drives. It's irrelevant.
What do explosives look like? I don't know. But I know that they look like something, and they probably don't look like electronics. So when you have a device that is a bunch of electronics and nothing else, I can pretty safely say that it does not look like a bomb, because there are no explosives.
This comment (about a muslim conference where the speakers were saying it's never acceptable to beat your wife) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10228134
Or this comment abut how SJWs love victim culture: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10228134
Or this comment saying African Americans have an average IQ of 80: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10223344
Or this flagged comment, that got a reply from dang: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9991230
That's quite a lot in a 45 day old account.
(Do you have "ShowDead" turned on?)
Hacker News has been a left-wing echo chamber ever since the crazies started flowing in during that period when every story on the front page was NSA related.
Now it's nearly impossible to have a reasoned discussion on any non-technical issue without SJWs using the voting system here to silence dissent.
I don't get how this can possibly be about left vs right. Common sense hopefully doesn't depend on which side of the political spectrum you fall into.
Which of the 3 points have been dis-proven?
Also take into concideration that -
1. The kid had a metal box containing PCBs and probably large components, all tide together around with a wire, and it was making beeping noises in class.
2. The school body and school district is almost 90% non-white, with the majority being "brown".
re. 2: He's asking the father to provide an image of something that was confiscated by the police or school administration. Furthermore, the first video with the boy contained a fairly detailed description of the clock, and the second video even contains an image of the box (or at least a similar box).
re. 3: Well, he provided an alternative explanation for that himself.
I'm basing this on 3 facts:
1. In 2015 it's highly unlikely that you could build a home-made clock that would be of the size and shape resembling a bomb - that is, unless it was made to look like a bomb.
2. Ahmed, his father, and anyone else with a phone camera (that is on Ahmed's side) would have posted a picture of the clock, or given a full description of it (size, shape, etc), in defense of Ahmed - that is, if it made sense, otherwise they would not. And I have not been able to find an image, nor a good description.
3. The initial teacher told him not to show it to anyone. You can break this down into that teacher having one of two opinions: A) It really did look like a bomb or B) its all about racism / hate / being anti-Muslim / anti-brown in that school (check the school's panel http://www.irvingisd.net/domain/2031 - that school is half brown and black).