News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Understanding the Historic Divergence Between Productivit... by WalterBright on Thursday September 03, 2015 @06:13PM (#10167829)
> don't decide to start new companies just because they saw opportunity on some competent person unemployed.

Right. But they would if there were a vast number of underpaid and overproductive workers, which is the thesis of the article.

> Enterprises need capital, risk taking, and several other factors that people don't just throw around.

Recognizing that there are a lot of underpaid yet overproducing workers and exploiting that is a form of arbitrage, and you can get financing for such a business plan. It's exactly the kind of opportunity investors are looking for.

Re:Understanding the Historic Divergence Between Productivit... by mcguire on Thursday September 03, 2015 @06:48PM (#10167954)
"...you can get financing for such a business plan..."

"Hello, this is EZ-Financing And Venture Capital. How may we give you money?"

"Hi, this is Bob, Entrepreneur Extraordinare. I have identified a great opportunity that I need financing to exploit. You see, I've discovered eighteen or twenty really bright, competent people who are either unemployed or underemployed."

"What do you mean?"

"Well, there's Bill, who discovered the gene for florescence and is currently working as a pick-up-and-drop-off driver for a car dealer [that one's true], and Frank the MIT PhD mechanical engineer who lives in the ally behind Wal-Mart. There's a bunch more."

"So, what's the nature of your opportunity?"

"I have nothing specific in mind, but I'm sure if I get this group in a room, they'll come up with something brilliant!"

("Oh, and I spell my name Danger."

click

"Hello?")

Re:Understanding the Historic Divergence Between Productivit... by WalterBright on Thursday September 03, 2015 @07:07PM (#10168023)
> I have nothing specific in mind,

You'd be right that nobody wants to finance someone who has no plan.

Re:Understanding the Historic Divergence Between Productivit... by marcosdumay on Thursday September 03, 2015 @06:37PM (#10167907)
And you insist that perfect arbitrage is something that exists. In an illiquid market, arbitrage is almost non-existent.

Have you started a company some time? If so, would you ever start one for applying the work of underpaid overproductive third party workers?

Re:Understanding the Historic Divergence Between Productivit... by WalterBright on Thursday September 03, 2015 @06:59PM (#10167993)
I've started several companies over the years. And yes, I'd love to find and hire those underpaid overproductive workers. I'd hire one today if he/she could convince me I'd make back double her/his salary. I know quite a few businessmen who'd do the same.

I've never gotten a phone call inviting me to join the secret cartel of employers holding wages down. :-)

Re:Understanding the Historic Divergence Between Productivit... by mentat on Friday September 04, 2015 @11:45AM (#10171176)
As an individual contributor, it's trivial for me to provide 2x my salary in revenue or margin for a business that knows what it's doing. If the business doesn't know what it's doing and it's willing to actually let me engage with customers, 10x becomes trivial. I don't believe I'm remotely unique in this either. Perhaps the issue is the "convince me" especially if there's ego about that state of the business that's in play.