Re:The MOOC revolution that wasn’t
by Netbeing on Sunday August 23, 2015 @06:25PM
(#10106966)
Serious editor fail: the main subject of the article is an acronym used ~20 times without ever defining it. I know what it stands for, but I'm sure some readers were frustrated by that.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
"Although MOOCs were hardly new in 2012—the term had been coined four years earlier by Canadian educators to describe their experiments with “connected,” open online learning— ..."
I suppose that passes as a basic explanation, but I agree that a better definition would be nice.