Re:Altitude has become the defining characteristic of roller...
by ohitsdom on Monday August 17, 2015 @12:50PM
(#10074338)
Weird article title. I was hoping to read an article about the constraints of building tall roller coasters (and hard limits, if any). This is just a review of 4 tall roller coasters, not even the steepest ones[0]. TBD if we can build one with a 500 foot drop.
Re:Altitude has become the defining characteristic of roller...
by Bluestrike2 on Monday August 17, 2015 @02:04PM
(#10074903)
Hard to believe that MF is fifteen years old. I remember waiting in line for hours in the sweltering heat when it first opened and many, many visits since.
Re:Altitude has become the defining characteristic of roller...
by jerhinesmith on Monday August 17, 2015 @01:11PM
(#10074488)
Agreed. Top Thrill is great for the "thrill" of hitting 120 mph and dropping ~400 feet, but it's over in a matter of seconds. I think they nailed it with the drag race metaphor. There's very little anticipation, and the payoff is immediate.
Re:Altitude has become the defining characteristic of roller...
by npongratz on Monday August 17, 2015 @01:42PM
(#10074755)
Most runs, Top Thrill Dragster indeed has little anticipation. I have experienced an exception once: I was in the front seat and glanced up, straight ahead, as the countdown started. In that instant just before takeoff, I noticed a number of seagulls lazily floating a couple feet above the track. Watching those birds continue across the tracks and out of the path of my face were the longest two to three seconds of my life.
Re:Altitude has become the defining characteristic of roller...
by DuskStar on Monday August 17, 2015 @02:20PM
(#10075027)
Even better than that is when you're in the coaster waiting to go, and then the one before you doesn't quite make it over - so you get to watch it come hurtling back at you! (And then wait 15 minutes for the wind to go down again)
Re:Altitude has become the defining characteristic of roller...
by ojbyrne on Monday August 17, 2015 @01:39PM
(#10074729)
Because a giga-coaster is specifically defined as smaller than that one:
"Enthusiasts use the term to apply to a roller coaster with a drop of 300 to 399 feet, meaning that its riders fall the length of a football field. (Anything beyond 400 feet and you’re in strata coaster terrain.)"
Re:Altitude has become the defining characteristic of roller...
by neonhomer on Monday August 17, 2015 @01:39PM
(#10074728)
A giga coaster is between 300-399 feet, while a strata coaster is 400+. I guess they didn't include the two strata coasters (Top Thrill Dragster being the second) because they don't go through as long of a ride.
Re:Altitude has become the defining characteristic of roller...
by foldor on Monday August 17, 2015 @01:18PM
(#10074553)
I was surprised to see the Leviathan was one of only 5 roller coasters in this category. I'll admit that seeing it in person is incredibly intimidating though. So much so that it was the only one I haven't been on yet.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_roller_coaster_ranking...
Back in 2014, there were lots of videos of Oculus Rift VR of simulated roller coasters, and the videos are on YouTube. That fad seems to be over.
https://youtu.be/LbN3NU4hIZg?t=22s
I disagree, since the line for it is usually quite long (over 1 hour wait), and the track surrounds the line.
"Enthusiasts use the term to apply to a roller coaster with a drop of 300 to 399 feet, meaning that its riders fall the length of a football field. (Anything beyond 400 feet and you’re in strata coaster terrain.)"
So yeah, weird article.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roller_coaster#By_height