News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:G is for Google by echelon on Monday August 10, 2015 @05:10PM (#10037372)
I wondered if the reorg would have any impact on the stock price. Given this joke, now I really wonder.

Are we sure it isn't April 1st? Are we sure this press release isn't a hoax?

This is so wild I'm having trouble believing any of it.

Re:G is for Google by davidcgl on Monday August 10, 2015 @05:32PM (#10037529)
It's an easter egg. It's a pretty common thing Google does.
Re:G is for Google by rancur on Monday August 10, 2015 @10:52PM (#10038849)
it's not an easter egg, just click the 'more' link
Re:G is for Google by Buge on Tuesday August 11, 2015 @12:55AM (#10039162)
The Hooli link is an easter egg. Hooli is the evil company (a parody of Google) in the show Silicon Valley.
Re:G is for Google by danneu on Tuesday August 11, 2015 @12:40AM (#10039121)
It's a hyperlinked period with the class "hidden-link".
Re:G is for Google by rrss1122 on Monday August 10, 2015 @05:45PM (#10037623)
One thing I've heard is that this would help them in terms of taxes, allowing them to write off projects that don't make money, although I'm not entirely clear on how Alphabet would accomplish this.

That would be no joke if that was a reason to do it.

Re:G is for Google by Jarwain on Monday August 10, 2015 @06:22PM (#10037840)
The first thing I thought of involved the regulations and other troubles that Google was facing in the EU. Those troubles seemed to summarize as "Google is too big and is taking advantage of its large market share". Alphabet looks like it'll fracture the google businesses more, which might help reduce the issues they're facing in the EU.

But that's just my best guess

Re:G is for Google by gutnor on Monday August 10, 2015 @08:03PM (#10038315)
Well, Google is already quite fractured in the EU - it has something like 20 subsidiaries, one in most EU countries[0] ?

That is also a common (mandatory?) setup, for multinational companies to have a local subsidiary in every country where they operate. I guess institutions like the EU must be handle that and focus on the activity independently of the fine details of the company structure, so that the restructuring would not really help or hinder.

[0] http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1288776/0001193125070...

Re:G is for Google by throwaway7767 on Tuesday August 11, 2015 @07:20AM (#10040212)
>> The first thing I thought of involved the regulations and other troubles that Google was facing in the EU. Those troubles seemed to summarize as "Google is too big and is taking advantage of its large market share". Alphabet looks like it'll fracture the google businesses more, which might help reduce the issues they're facing in the EU. > Well, Google is already quite fractured in the EU - it has something like 20 subsidiaries, one in most EU countries

Seperation at the marketing end for ad services, or for purposes of tax optimisation, does not really alleviate any of the antitrust concerns. It's the services that matter. Google's main ad business and search being in the same company for example.

So the current EU subsidiaries would not have an effect on the EU investigation, but this current plan might.

Re:G is for Google by fixermark on Tuesday August 11, 2015 @08:11AM (#10040380)
IANAL, but it seems unlikely. The Alphabet move doesn't appear to be splitting out the components the EU regulators appear to care about (search, ads, maps) from each other. If regulators are concerned about the effects of personal information consolidation, that's not changing.
Re:G is for Google by TheOsiris on Monday August 10, 2015 @05:49PM (#10037652)
couldn't they do that now anyway with all being under the same entity. I don't think this helps with taxes (at least not in this regard).

Either way, WOW!

Re:G is for Google by rrss1122 on Monday August 10, 2015 @06:04PM (#10037739)
I see. I wasn't entirely clear on it, and I guess the source I got it from wasn't either.
Re:G is for Google by diminish on Monday August 10, 2015 @05:36PM (#10037567)
Alphabet is only missing a startup accelerator, why wouldn't Sergey and Larry now focus on earlier stage themselves? All those ambitious things can be achieved better by a lot of startupa competing in parallel.
Re:G is for Google by sospep on Monday August 10, 2015 @06:48PM (#10037985)
y is for ycombinator - a startup accelerator owned by google - hmmmmmmm
Re:G is for Google by tmpforareason on Monday August 10, 2015 @09:50PM (#10038667)
A - AirBnb U - Uber P - Pinterest or Palantir (they need to work hard) May be they should create a sub companies for the collisions.

Btw, i was thinking Amazon A2Z was doing this virtually.

Re:G is for Google by JacobAldridge on Monday August 10, 2015 @05:49PM (#10037658)
V is for Ventures and Capital

W is for Wing

X is for X Lab

Y is for ...

Re:G is for Google by einrealist on Monday August 10, 2015 @06:17PM (#10037812)
Yolo
Re:G is for Google by matmann2001 on Monday August 10, 2015 @05:54PM (#10037686)
Youtube
Re:G is for Google by neuronic on Monday August 10, 2015 @06:13PM (#10037789)
Nope, Alphabet spells YouTube with a G.
Re:G is for Google by jonlucc on Tuesday August 11, 2015 @02:43PM (#10043427)
Gootube is Alphabet's new Soylent competitor.
Re:G is for Google by zapu on Tuesday August 11, 2015 @06:57AM (#10040148)
Yo.
Re:G is for Google by tim333 on Monday August 10, 2015 @07:26PM (#10038156)
>... any impact on the stock price.

It's up 5.88% (or $26bn) in after hours trading.