xiaohanyu
Reminds me the good old days when I learn emacs lisp.
My question is, why lisp here? What is the unique advantage of using common lisp over other langs for coding harness scenario?
And for web, does it generate plain HTML/CSS, the DOM tree, or just generate everything in a canvas?
For no reason facebook blocked my account long time ago.
Can't figure out how to recover at all.
No response and no way to appeal.
How long did it take to develop?
Have you considered the competitors like tiptap editor? Curious what is your opinion VS tiptap's pros/cons.
They lied to you. Building software is hard
Pretty nice description.
Snowtree: Review-Driven Safe AI Coding
Does gitmore just call GitHub API or counts by commits manually?
Any more details about why this project is unmaintainable?
A open source Node.js lib that allows people to create and version control resumes using YAML.
Support LaTeX/PDF/Markdown outputs in one shot with professional typesetting. Support English/Chinese/Norwegian/French languages out of the box. With clang style, real time error reporting.
To release soon: HTML output.
Large Language Models
Show HN: YAMLResume, a Resume Compiler with Clang Style Error Reporting
I admit that typst is quite promising and given enough time, its adoption will increase quite a lot.
The idea:
1. apply strict schema validation to YAML so AI won't generate wrong/invalid data 2. write prompt to AI help people generate a sample YAMLResume 3. adopt AI to parse existing PDF or images and convert it to YAMLResume format
I wrote a post half year ago explained the details for my decision between LaTeX and Typst: https://blog.ppresume.com/posts/on-typesetting-engines#typst
Show HN: YAMLResume, Open Source Node.js Tool to Create Resumes as Code in YAML
For me, I think groff/LaTeX/SILE/typst all belongs to same category, i.e, the author write some markup language, then processed by some processors, then get an output. I chose LaTeX and Typst as the classic ones in my post:
- LaTeX is the classic, old school typesetting engine - Typst, clearly more modern, with many advanced design like incremental compilation, wasm and web app, instant preview, better error message.
For others, groff/SILE, to be honest I don't have time to dive into each of these.
----
Do you see any advantages of groff over LaTeX?
I guess: 1) the incremental compilation speed, 2) the modern user experience (better error message things, better syntax, etc)?
Yes you are right, I am not a linguist so I have little knowledge for "Indo" languages.
Originally I adopted the word of "Germanic languages" then I found Spanish is not a Germanic language hence I then adopted "Indo European" language.
This needs a fix for sure.