News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

woopwoop

I really don't understand this. Mathematics was and still is the most open intellectual discipline. There was more good work from unknown people recognized than anywhere else. It's one of the reasons all this was possible: there were objective standards that could not be waved away, so when ML models achieved things it couldn't be denied.
This is the first machine generated text I have seen that I would call genuinely hilarious. A little eerie
I am a former mathematician now working a regular job (not affiliated with OpenAI). Just speaking for myself, I find this statement deeply embarrassing and at odds with the spirit of open inquiry for which the community of mathematics has (nearly) always been a standard bearer.
Re:CS240 AI Cheating Retrospective on Wednesday September 30, 2026 @05:34PM (#49914792)
> Second, while the percentage of students identified was substantial, it was still less than 50%.

No doubt the student body will learn this lesson, and in the future the number of students identified as having cheated will be near zero.

What do you think the word virulence means?
The author seems to be arguing that it is biologically impossible or something to have a virus with the same transmission properties as COVID but higher virulence. I don't understand what principle he is invoking to make this claim.
Re:Why I Left Google DeepMind on Monday July 27, 2026 @10:42AM (#49070421)
I'm like the Japanese soldier who kept fighting into the 1970s on this, but actually signalling is about taking costly action. When people call something virtue signalling what they usually mean is that it's cheap talk, but this is wrong. The whole point of signalling is that it's costly. A more correct application of virtue signalling would be something like those people who contort their lives to genuinely try to produce zero garbage. This is a truly costly action, but it is signalling in the sense that it is more about showing that one cares by being effortful than actually doing something effectual.
Re:"Don't You Just Upload It to ChatGPT?" on Saturday June 13, 2026 @02:14AM (#48513928)
I have a graduate degree in mathematics. AI models can absolutely help you do research math in 2026. I recently asked chatGPT to prove a result which I know to have been published in Advances in Mathematics (a pretty good, but not top tier, journal) this year, and it gave a correct proof which was completely distinct from the one that was published.
Re:The Cost of Owning a Home on Tuesday May 26, 2026 @05:51PM (#48286496)
I got my mortgage at 2.5% interest. The mortgage was about equal to all of the cash I had before buying, and I'm pretty sure I could (and should) have gotten a much larger mortgage before buying. Mortgages are essentially the only way for ordinary people to access that kind of credit. That's why buying a house is such a good deal. No one's lending an ordinary 30-year-old hundreds of thousands of dollars at 2.5% interest to plow into the S&P 500.

Of course, this kind of credit is _incredibly_ risky. People don't think of it this way, but a mortgage is essentially a massively leveraged bet on your local housing market. Which is already gives your risk profile an incredible lack of diversity. The most valuable thing you "own" in the time of your life when you buy a house is usually your future earnings potential, and your house will be the second most valuable thing you own. The thing is, both of these things are highly correlated with your local economy, so buying a house doubles down on your already high exposure to local economic conditions. People think of owning a home as a kind of boring, safe, low risk/low reward investment, but it's really exactly the opposite.

Re:Refuse to let your doctor record you on Friday April 24, 2026 @12:19PM (#47892279)
That's not a nit. There's not much left of the articles point once you take this on board.
Rigor is not the whole point of math. Understanding is. Rigor is a tool for producing understanding. For a further articulation of this point, see

https://arxiv.org/abs/math/9404236

Re:Why the Global Elite Gave Up on Spelling and Grammar on Wednesday March 11, 2026 @01:51PM (#47338836)
But Houston Street is older than Sam Houston, and was always pronounced that way.
Re: on Tuesday March 10, 2026 @10:55AM (#47324119)
Machine generated text.
Re:ai;dr on Thursday February 12, 2026 @03:02PM (#46994298)
I actually have worked in this space and it, uh, has not shaken my belief that powerpoint talks are bad.
Re:ai;dr on Thursday February 12, 2026 @12:47PM (#46992220)
I like the idea that various communications media have implicit social contracts that can be broken. In my opinion, power point presentations break an implicit social contract that is held in handwritten talks: if it's worth you displaying a piece of information, so that I the listener feel the need to take it in or even copy it down, it has to be worth your time to actually physically write it on the board. With power point talks this is not honored, and the average power point talk is much, much worse than the average chalk talk. I bet there are lots of other examples.
Last time I flew Delta they no longer had this bot, which made me sad. One of my favorite parts of flying was getting absolutely crushed into a tiny cube by the airplane seat's easy chess bot, and then again by the airplane seat itself when the person in front of me reclines their seat.
Good negative feedback is a public service, a gift from the critic to you, and a severely undersupplied one in this world we live in.
Re:Two Kinds of Vibe Coding on Friday December 19, 2025 @05:04PM (#46331505)
Do you think that the average person can get a gold on the IMO?
In 2019, NPR's planet money did a segment on the Hong Kong protests that heavily featured Jimmy Lai. This segment from the end has always stuck with me.

GOLDSTEIN: China has not allowed more freedom of speech. Publications can still be shut down for criticizing the government. And yet, China has gotten richer. It started to develop its own financial center in Shanghai. Foreign money can now flow into China without going through Hong Kong, so the Chinese Communist Party doesn't need Hong Kong as much as it used to.

This has led to more and more tension between people in Hong Kong and the Chinese Communist Party, the Chinese government. In 2014, there was a fight over how to choose the government official who runs Hong Kong, and a million people in Hong Kong took to the streets to protest. Just last month, the government official who runs Hong Kong wanted to pass a new law that would allow people in Hong Kong to be extradited to China to stand trial. The people in Hong Kong said, we don't trust your mainland courts. Two million people protested in the streets, including, by the way, Jimmy Lai, who is now in his 70s.

What was it like? What was it like walking that day?

LAI: I was very excited - when you see so many people, you know, is fighting for a moral issue. We don't have guns. We don't have tanks. We don't have anything. The only thing we have the Chinese government don't is the moral authority we have, the moral courage we have.

GOLDSTEIN: The moral authority and courage, yeah.

LAI: Yes.

GOLDSTEIN: A few weeks later, on July 1, on the anniversary of Hong Kong's return to Chinese rule, protesters broke into the Hong Kong legislature buildings, smashed glass walls and spray-painted graffiti. Chinese leaders see these protesters and Jimmy Lai, for that matter, as agents for foreign influence - as, you know, basically latter-day colonialists. His house has been firebombed, and there was an assassination plot against him.

LAI: I stopped thinking about this because if I let the fear frighten me, I cannot go on, you know, because with what I have taken up, I have to sustain it. I will be the last to leave. That is like a captain who cannot jump the ship.

GOLDSTEIN: I mean, you're rich. You could leave if you wanted.

LAI: Yeah. If I'm rich but an a*hole...

GOLDSTEIN: (Laughter).

LAI: ...What my kids will think about me?

GOLDSTEIN: Yeah.

LAI: You know, being rich, you can be very poor...

GOLDSTEIN: Go on. Say more.

LAI: ...Because if you only have money, you lost the meaning, you lost the dignity, you lost everything as a human being. What else do you have?

Re:The past was not that cute on Monday December 08, 2025 @09:28AM (#46192598)
Yes, Malthusian society was very boring, that's my point.
Re:The past was not that cute on Monday December 08, 2025 @12:16AM (#46188640)
But in this world the distribution of social backgrounds in the population had very low entropy. Over 90% of people were just working the land.
Re:The past was not that cute on Sunday December 07, 2025 @12:30PM (#46183382)
If the Canterbury Tales had been actually representative of the time in which they were written, it would not have been the Knight's Tale, the Miller's Tale, the Reeve's Tale, etc. It would have been the Subsistence Farmer's Tale, the Subsistence Farmer's Tale, the Subsistence Farmer's Tale, etc.
Re:OpenAI declares 'code red' as Google catches up in AI race on Tuesday December 02, 2025 @03:31PM (#46126423)
Maybe? But you could have written this same thing in 1999 with OpenAI and Google replaced by Google and Yahoo, respectively.
Re:Is Matrix Multiplication Ugly? on Saturday November 22, 2025 @04:14PM (#46018334)
Matrix multiplication is not ugly, but matrices themselves are ugly, mainly because they encode the arbitrary operation of choosing a basis. There's nothing especially nice about the pixel basis for images, or about the token basis for language. But of all the things that make up modern deep learning, matrix multiplication is surely the _least_ ugly. Relu/gelu is not pretty! Batch normalization is vomit-inducing!! Imagenet normalization? JFC!!!
Re:Gwern's "Stem Humor" Directory on Saturday November 22, 2025 @03:50PM (#46018133)
https://people.mpim-bonn.mpg.de/zagier/files/math-mag/63-2/f...

"How often should you beat your kids?", by Don Zagier.

> This note is a follow-up to the note "How to beat your kids at their own game" by K. Levasseur, in which the author proposes the following game to be played against one's own children: ... Levasseur analyzes the game and shows that on average you will have a score of n + (sqrt(pi * n) - 1) / 2 + O(n^{-1/2}), while the kid, of course, will have an average score of exactly n.

> We maintain, however, that only the most degenerate parent would play against a 2-year-old for money, and that our concern should therefore be not by how much you expect to win, but with probability you will win at all.

Re:AI World Clocks on Friday November 14, 2025 @11:52PM (#45935138)
The qwen clocks are art.
Re:Some people can't see mental images on Thursday October 30, 2025 @06:33PM (#45766181)
Are you saying that a non-aphantasic person can recall the eye color of everyone in their office?
I do not, and have never, understood why absolute R&D investment is compared to relative growth rate in this literature. It would make sense to compare R&D spending as a percentage of GDP to relative growth, or to compare absolute R&D spending to absolute per-year growth, but I remain mystified by the comparison of absolute R&D spending with relative growth.
Re:Guess I'm a Rationalist Now on Thursday June 19, 2025 @09:06PM (#44323907)
Agree, but I think there is another, more important factor. They are a highly visible part of the internet, and their existence is mainly internet-based. This means that the people assessing them are mainly on the internet, and as we all know, internet discourse tends to the blandly negative (ironically my own comment is a mild example of this).

Older ยป