News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

wienke

They never really were part of it. These gateways are barely used.
Re:New LoRa RF distance record: 1336 km / 830 mi on Thursday September 07, 2023 @09:41AM (#37418790)
can't argue with that
Re:New LoRa RF distance record: 1336 km / 830 mi on Thursday September 07, 2023 @09:22AM (#37418546)
Yeah we now support 1.5M devices with our community network and enterprise network. And the most successful ones sent the least amount of data. Here is a list of all the supported devices: https://www.thethingsnetwork.org/device-repository/
Re:New LoRa RF distance record: 1336 km / 830 mi on Thursday September 07, 2023 @09:18AM (#37418493)
The added this line to their LoRA Github though: "(For the radio communication technique, see LoRa.)"
Re:New LoRa RF distance record: 1336 km / 830 mi on Thursday September 07, 2023 @09:08AM (#37418363)
Why did the moderator remove the distance? That is like the main fun message.
Re:New LoRa RF distance record: 1336 km / 830 mi on Thursday September 07, 2023 @09:08AM (#37418357)
Yes, this is an outlier and it took around 8 years for this to be emerge and be detected by the community run TTN mapper initiative. The main fun thing about this is more that it shows how cool it is to have a global community network where we enjoy sending messages for the sake of it just to learn technology. Like kids with 2 cans and a string between them.
Re:New LoRa RF distance record: 1336 km / 830 mi on Thursday September 07, 2023 @09:05AM (#37418328)
Yes, this was 868MHz
Re:New LoRa RF distance record: 1336 km / 830 mi on Thursday September 07, 2023 @09:05AM (#37418320)
So it takes more than 5 dollars. You also need a gateway but you can get these for 99 dollars. Still this technology has a very low barrier to entry for such a long range and low power capability.
Re:New LoRa RF distance record: 1336 km / 830 mi on Thursday September 07, 2023 @09:03AM (#37418309)
What is astroturf? If I Google it I see fake grass.
Re:New LoRa RF distance record: 1336 km / 830 mi on Thursday September 07, 2023 @09:00AM (#37418277)
Good point. We'll add that to the next post if there is a new record. Also what can be confusing is that the business viable part is even much smaller than the technical viable part. The low power operations is really only at lower SF7 or SF8. And we push our partners and ecosystem to keep the payload as small as possible as every byte counts. It is a completely different way of thinking than WiFi or cellular. Yet I do agree it is presented with the same terms and paradigm and that is confusing.
Re:New LoRa RF distance record: 1336 km / 830 mi on Thursday September 07, 2023 @07:26AM (#37417394)
Go for it! These communities are pretty active so you can also join one of their events.
Re:New LoRa RF distance record: 1336 km / 830 mi on Thursday September 07, 2023 @07:24AM (#37417380)
That is pretty cool. You might want to try again with 2.4Ghz LoRa. Range is shorter but still longer than 868mhz. If you search 2.4Ghz LoRa on our Youtube channel you'll find some interesting content on that.
Re:New LoRa RF distance record: 1336 km / 830 mi on Thursday September 07, 2023 @06:48AM (#37417100)
Recently somebody created this guide to turn your Helium gateway (running on a RPi) to a TTN gateway: https://medium.com/@friedkiwi/repurposing-helium-iot-hotspot...
Re:New LoRa RF distance record: 1336 km / 830 mi on Thursday September 07, 2023 @05:59AM (#37416754)
So people that are not known here have nothing interesting to share? Recipe for an echo chamber.
Re:New LoRa RF distance record: 1336 km / 830 mi on Thursday September 07, 2023 @05:45AM (#37416677)
Ah thanks for the education. I updated my profile. Will try to gain more karma to gain more respect.
Re:New LoRa RF distance record: 1336 km / 830 mi on Thursday September 07, 2023 @05:39AM (#37416637)
How would that exactly work?
Re:New LoRa RF distance record: 1336 km / 830 mi on Thursday September 07, 2023 @05:38AM (#37416634)
km are better though :)
Re:New LoRa RF distance record: 1336 km / 830 mi on Thursday September 07, 2023 @05:38AM (#37416631)
If you want to know more Thomas Telkamp used that Telescope for a nice experiment and bounced a LoRa message on the moon: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nIdCzvLWCEc
Re:New LoRa RF distance record: 1336 km / 830 mi on Thursday September 07, 2023 @05:35AM (#37416611)
Sorry, I am here in all transparency. Not really hard to find out though as my first name and TTN are quite a unique pair.
Re:New LoRa RF distance record: 1336 km / 830 mi on Thursday September 07, 2023 @05:12AM (#37416471)
There are already 89 gateways in Vienna you can directly use. So nothing is holding you back :) https://www.thethingsnetwork.org/community/vienna/
Re:New LoRa RF distance record: 1336 km / 830 mi on Thursday September 07, 2023 @05:11AM (#37416461)
For sure would be great but LoRa has limitations as it is designed for small sensors that sent very little data: https://www.thethingsnetwork.org/docs/lorawan/limitations/
Re:Ask HN: Any Hardware Startups Here? on Wednesday July 05, 2023 @02:50PM (#36605244)
At https://www.thethingsindustries.com and the open source LoRaWAN developer platform https://www.thethingsnetwork.org we used to do a lot of hardware ourselves: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/419277966/the-things-ne....

Now we do very little and only focus on the SaaS network management part of it. We still have this product www.genericnode.com

We now have 220 hardware partners that can do it much much better than us: https://www.thethingsnetwork.org/device-repository/

Re:Building a city optimized for bikes is a choice on Friday March 10, 2023 @10:08AM (#35095224)
So the point of the article is that if you decide something now it will effect how the world looks in 50 years. The picture with the 2000 vision shows how others thought at that time. If the Dutch would have chosen that path, it now would look like that. City architecture are the way they are because we made decisions on how we wanted it to be.
Re:Building a city optimized for bikes is a choice on Friday March 10, 2023 @08:24AM (#35094036)
I don't see the same. And also have a biased opinion on the excessive amount of public space it takes in a crowded city. A speeding bike needs much more room to break for instance. And notifying the entire neighborhood about at VanMoof being slightly touched with an alarm is also improper use of public space.
Re:Building a city optimized for bikes is a choice on Friday March 10, 2023 @08:20AM (#35093996)
Yeah, for some tourists this is actually confusing because many times the biking lanes are confused with sidewalks and then get very soon notified in a Dutch way by the locals :)
Re:Building a city optimized for bikes is a choice on Friday March 10, 2023 @08:17AM (#35093966)
In the complete spectrum it is a budget e-bike right? The proper ones are much more expensive.

Older »