tysonzni
tysonzni on Hacker News
Posted by
tysonzni on Monday November 04, 2019 @12:10AM
from the statistics.fas.harvard.edu dept.
Posted by
tysonzni on Sunday August 04, 2019 @05:41AM
from the journals.plos.org dept.
Posted by
tysonzni on Sunday June 23, 2019 @04:39PM
from the jpl.nasa.gov dept.
Posted by
tysonzni on Sunday March 10, 2019 @01:18PM
from the hbr.org dept.
I think it makes sense to ask companies to explicitly list cultural values they prioritize the most as well as what they value the least. Evaluating/creating a company culture is in a way really about understanding what the tradeoffs and sacrifices are.
Posted by
tysonzni on Thursday February 14, 2019 @08:58PM
from the sf.streetsblog.org dept.
Posted by
tysonzni on Thursday February 07, 2019 @03:02AM
from the bloomberg.com dept.
Posted by
tysonzni on Saturday September 01, 2018 @01:25PM
from the erikbern.com dept.
Posted by
tysonzni on Monday August 27, 2018 @12:38PM
from the nytimes.com dept.
Posted by
tysonzni on Tuesday July 24, 2018 @03:56PM
from the predictions.global dept.
Posted by
tysonzni on Sunday July 22, 2018 @07:55PM
from the bloomberg.com dept.
Is the game for members only?
No it does not. From NIH study: (
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5026916/)
>We use high-quality linked Social Security and Medicare records to estimate life tables for the older U.S. population over the full range of birth regions. In 2000–2009, the foreign-born had a 2.4-year advantage in life expectancy at age 65 relative to the U.S.-born, with Asian-born subgroups displaying exceptionally high longevity. Foreign-born individuals who migrated more recently had lower mortality compared with those who migrated earlier. Nonetheless, we also find remarkable similarities in life expectancy among many foreign-born subgroups that were born in very different geographic and socioeconomic contexts (e.g., Central America, western/eastern Europe, and Africa).
I don't know how China collect its public health statistics, but its economics numbers have been extensively studied. And the consensus is that its official GDP growth figures were overstated historically (by as much as 67%), but had been mostly accurate post-1996.
Study: https://www.stlouisfed.org/publications/regional-economist/s...
Posted by
tysonzni on Wednesday May 23, 2018 @02:51AM
from the tensorflow.rstudio.com dept.
Posted by
tysonzni on Wednesday May 16, 2018 @02:17PM
from the ai.googleblog.com dept.
Yeah you're right. Randomization at least ensures internal validity of the study as applied to people who are interested in WFH. Whether it generalizes to others is an open question.
Posted by
tysonzni on Friday May 11, 2018 @04:44AM
from the reuters.com dept.
The paper mentioned how randomization (a lottery draw on odd/even birth dates) was done among employees who expressed interest. So it is a randomized experiment.
According to the paper, the random selection was done on participants who expressed interest.
> Approximately half of the employees (503) were interested, particularly those who had less education and tenure, their own rooms, and faced longer commutes. Of these, 249 were qualified to take part in the experiment by virtue of having at least six months’ tenure, broadband access, and a private room at home in which they could work. After a lottery draw, those em- ployees with even-numbered birthdays were selected to work from home, and those with odd-numbered birthdates stayed in the office to act as the control group.
In the new equilibrium of people sending lots of automated emails, how would the receiver of an email distinguish between a canned response and a real response? I suspect the incentive to properly signal your email as real can reduce adoption of "Smart Compose" for non-trivial communication. So that leaves us with use cases like scheduling meetings, quick updates or alerts - most of which are already automated in some extent through notification and logging.
You're right. But I think the single-value, hyper-transparent nature of prediction market can create an institutional feedback loop that's more powerful than what arises from the diverse, individually held opinions that others don't know about.
How do you deal with the cultural challenge of convincing people there's value and selfish benefits to having more transparency?
I've noticed that in large organizations certain information are held by a small number of people who may be reluctant to share them for political reasons. Another challenge with internal prediction markets is the possibility that knowing the "probability" of an project-related outcome reduces morale and hence creates a self-fulfilling prophecy that further reduces the chance of success. Appreciate your insights.
Posted by
tysonzni on Wednesday May 02, 2018 @10:33PM
from the erikbern.com dept.
Posted by
tysonzni on Friday April 27, 2018 @06:34PM
from the wsj.com dept.
Interesting point - I highly doubt the suspect was a "prior suspect". But in this case I believe investigators were able to find additional evidence after they matched the DNA. So in Bayesian terms, multiple updates (DNA match + location match + suspect appearance match + other physical evidence) were made to their prior.
Additionally, I think investigators tend to act more carefully in a high profile case than in a typical case, so I expect that they possess some additional conclusive evidence.
It sounds like Peter Thiel's argument about how natural monopolies can afford to invest heavily in R&D because they're financially comfortable. And how competitive industries supposedly don't offer the same room for research. I think he's mistaken on this but nonetheless it's a compelling argument in some cases.
Here's his essay where he expands on it:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/peter-thiel-competition-is-for-...
Increasing returns to scale isn't the only way unit costs can go down. Competitive forces typically incentivize companies to come up with new ways to increase productivity and reduce cost. Having even one competitor is enough to meaningfully reshape the incentives of a monopolist. But you may well be right about the negative utility of having 4 vs 3 companies in this particular industry.
Lots of people in the DNA databases are relatives to someone who lived in Sacramento.The lead came from the police searching through DNA databases which identified some set of relatives who were suspicious, but they later obtained the DNA from the suspect himself which was an exact match to what was gathered from crime scenes.