throwaway98764
Re:My Pixel has a manufacturing defect
on Saturday December 10, 2016 @01:25PM (#13147030)
It's probably cheaper for Google to ignore the complaints and foot the lawsuit bill when/if it ever comes due. They have the cash, and it seems like the attitude of companies like Google is to "ask forgiveness, not permission."
Re:How I Focus Now
on Friday December 09, 2016 @04:22PM (#13141966)
Good article.
Re:Wrong signal
on Monday November 28, 2016 @12:09PM (#13056756)
Parent had a good point. It shouldn't have been flagged.
Re:Wrong signal
on Monday November 28, 2016 @08:34AM (#13055260)
Federation was only addressed insofar as Moxie Marlinspike the developer noted it would be hard to keep the protocol updated if the servers were shared (he compared his tech to Facebook and WhatsApp, and described federated email as "stuck in time").
There's nothing unduly alarmist about the article, but it makes appropriate claims about (among other things) the security limitations that Signal has resigned itself to by remaining unfederated. Read TFA.
Re:Some in Silicon Valley wonder if Facebook has grown too influential
on Thursday November 10, 2016 @11:21AM (#12921710)
Cryptographically verified, by the way:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4213
Re:Some in Silicon Valley wonder if Facebook has grown too influential
on Thursday November 10, 2016 @11:19AM (#12921688)
This good enough for you?
Re:A Formal Security Analysis of the Signal Messaging Protocol
on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @12:03PM (#12901898)
I don't know about the rest of you, but I'm here for the insights. Trying to court everyone just waters down the comments until HN is indistinguishable from reddit. I prefer apparent condescension and a thick skin over PC half-conversations and watered-down intelligence.
Re:Evidence that birds sleep in mid-flight
on Thursday October 27, 2016 @07:26PM (#12811385)
Gives a new meaning to the term, "sleep with one eye open at night." :)
Re:Wikileaks: Julian Assange's internet access 'cut'
on Monday October 17, 2016 @01:10PM (#12726935)
Simple: character limit on Twitter, want to provide context to the statement, and want more exposure to the quote than a link would provide.