A Formal Security Analysis of the Signal Messaging Protocol

Re:A Formal Security Analysis of the Signal Messaging Protocol by throwaway98764 on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @12:03PM (#12901898)

I don't know about the rest of you, but I'm here for the insights. Trying to court everyone just waters down the comments until HN is indistinguishable from reddit. I prefer apparent condescension and a thick skin over PC half-conversations and watered-down intelligence.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A Formal Security Analysis of the Signal Messaging Protocol by taejo on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @03:19PM (#12903574)

You can have the insights without the insults. They add literally nothing, except to degrade the conversation until HN is indistinguishable from 4chan.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A Formal Security Analysis of the Signal Messaging Protocol by sametmax on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @05:01AM (#12908776)

I agree. I didn't mean to start a PC war, just noticed that the term seemed out of place.

[ Parent | on HN ]