tgummerer
Re:A div that looks different in every browser
on Sunday July 08, 2018 @04:48PM (#17486121)
Especially C++ compilers have undefined behavior
Re:Introducing Git protocol version 2
on Friday May 18, 2018 @04:26PM (#17104697)
As mentioned in another comment, protocol v2 was implemented by a Google employee, and they decided to write a blog post about it. This is not an official git announcement.
Re:Introducing Git protocol version 2
on Friday May 18, 2018 @04:24PM (#17104679)
It's because a Google employee implemented protocol v2, and wrote a post about it.
Re:Why I Fell in Love with Arch Linux (2015)
on Thursday September 14, 2017 @09:10AM (#15247572)
> It just works and during all these years my system was never left broken after an update
I find that very hard to believe. While I am still running Arch (gotta love those shiny new features), updates did break something minor fairly frequently due to occasionally incompatible updates, e.g. a missing symbol in a shared object.
Luckily there was only one time where something major broke which took me a few hours to fix.
Re:Google I/O 2017
on Wednesday May 17, 2017 @01:27PM (#14360629)
Are any?
Re:U.S. To Ban Laptops in All Cabins of Flights from Europe
on Thursday May 11, 2017 @03:17AM (#14314345)
The article goes into more details on that. Basically the fire extinguishers are not powerful enough against lithium-ion battery fires.
If you can upgrade you can use "git stash -p" with pathspecs as well, so you can stash some changes in a specific file without having to go through changes in other files.
Re:UK Home Secretary says encryption on messaging services is unaccept...
on Sunday March 26, 2017 @07:22AM (#13960210)
You don't really have to roll your own crypto to create such an app. There's always openssl and the signal protocol, which you'd only need to implement without designing anything.
Sure that can go wrong as anything can, but it's far from rolling your own crypto and makes things a lot easier.
Re:SHA1 collisions make Git vulnerable to attacks
on Monday February 27, 2017 @02:41AM (#13742578)
I feel like this still ignores most of what Linus said on why git isn't broken. In particular "it's fairly trivial to detect the fingerprints of using this attack" in his Google+ post. https://plus.google.com/+LinusTorvalds/posts/7tp2gYWQugL
And there are already patches on the mailing list for that.