svikashk

I wanted to add: This is by no means THE framework. There are other good frameworks out there. But I've found them to be two steps ahead. In my experience, I've always seen these components play a critical role before anything else:

1. Your TAM 2. Your ACV 3. Product's Category 4. If people are looking for a solution like yours

And I pair them up with:

1. Buyer Persona 2. Number of decision makers involved 3. Avg. Sales Cycles 4. Room to engineer vitality into the product.

This has been a guiding principle for me. And I'm happy to answer any Qs if any :).

Still plenty of challenges considering you need to store in -80C. Possible in developed countries, but I doubt if it’s doable in developing countries.

Definitely a step in the right direction though

More than anything, the problem with these assistants is it’s still socially awkward to talk to a computer.

I can imagine people using it exponentially more when you no longer get weird looks when you say “Ok google” or whatever in a supermarket.

I’ve used many converters in my life, but Pandoc is the one I always end up using every time

> It feels nice knowing that it cannot be taken away from me by anyone.

One of the main reasons why I download stuff (YouTube videos/articles), so I can always revisit it whenever I want to.

This is an interesting approach and definitely feels like a more holistic approach than anything else that’s out there.

This is such a good article. I’ve always wondered the same thing.