News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

snowy

This article is wrong. It states: "MicroTik Cloud Core routers, mainly used by enterprises, may be affected if they run versions 1016, 1036 or 1072 of the MicroTik RouterOS.

Those are model numbers, not firmware versions. He lifted that from this Krebs artical (https://krebsonsecurity.com/2018/05/fbi-kindly-reboot-your-r...) which is also wrong.

All Mikrotik products running less than version 6.38.5 are vulnerable: https://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?t=134776

It makes me wonder what else is wrong....

Re:Linode Turns 14 on Friday June 16, 2017 @03:16PM (#14571869)
If they don't have an ASN. It also means they don't have their own IP address space and could not build a transit network.
WARNING!! Loud auto playing video!
Re:Early paper money from British Colonial America on Monday April 17, 2017 @09:02AM (#14130599)
Thirty Shillings

To counterfeit is DEATH

How prevalent were counterfeit notes in this period vs now?

Re:I had a health crisis in France on Sunday November 20, 2016 @08:40AM (#12998772)
If doctors and nurses are at breaking point, its down to them been underfunded and under resourced. Blaming this on immigration is unhelpful and wrong!!
Re:Dyn Analysis Summary of Friday October 21 Attack on Wednesday October 26, 2016 @05:52PM (#12800988)
Can any one explain why they keep referring to this as a complex attack? From the article it seems to be a simple volumetric attack. They mention that it uses UDP port and TCP port 53, nothing complex about that...

Am I missing something here. It wasn't an L7 attack (or was it?) Why keep referring to it as complex?

Older »