News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

rumblings

Re:Why Substack will win over everybody on Saturday November 12, 2022 @08:48AM (#33572996)
If substack play its cards right, then we're looking at NYT on steroids
Re:Tech Isn't Special Anymore on Thursday November 10, 2022 @02:24AM (#33543304)
Thoughts on BigTech and Startups
Re:Show HN: I may have created a new type of puzzle on Sunday September 18, 2022 @01:34PM (#32889519)
interesting game
Re:Pypi.org is running a survey on the state of Python packaging on Thursday September 08, 2022 @02:17AM (#32761860)
After working with Java for over a year professionally, I really appreciate its dependency management system(Maven or Gradle). Whereas with Python it is always a mess(Poetry looks promising though).
Re:Rewriting my blog in Rust for fun and profit on Monday August 29, 2022 @02:29PM (#32641702)
This. All the big static generators in the market are kinda of generic enough that they demand upfront investment from you. Whether its Jekyll, Hugo or any big shot you have to fit a lot of things according to them. My personal website is built by Jekyll, but I finding a lot harder to make changes because I am not comfortable with a Ruby tooling( Once, I had to debug an obscure Ruby related bug in M1 Mac). I am comfortable with Python though( I have considerable proficiency and good documentation) which then I will use it for my own static generator.

I guess writing your own non-generic own-static generator should be relatively easy and worth the effort as you wouldn't have to read some obscure documentation (like Jekyll).

Use ListMonk. Its an open source software. Used and developed by a unicorn.