1992 Deleuze: production, enclosure toward control [pdf]
How might we be effected by this perspective/view and (if interested) how might it change the work we choose to participate within?https://files.nyu.edu/dnm232/public/deleuze_postcript.pdf
Also might be relevant here https://hoursofidleconversation.wordpress.com/essays/interru...
or perhaps: thus fitness functions should be taken seriously, but not literally?
1. it’s a logical flaw to think that if we have to take it seriously, we also have to take it literally.
That literalness narrows us, keeps us in the confines of language. Seriousness let's us act/respond, literalness is extra.
2. The experiences of everyday life — my real feeling of a headache, my real taste of chocolate — that really is the ultimate nature of reality.
Returning/remembering the sensual world, the everydayness of things, less cluttered by our literal interpretation is a way of reconnecting with "reality". It is a move away from metaphysics by questioning the metaphysics we may hold without realizing it.
How might we be effected by this perspective/view and (if interested) how might it change the work we choose to participate within?https://files.nyu.edu/dnm232/public/deleuze_postcript.pdf
Perhaps a relevant post: http://www.samharris.org/blog/item/life-without-free-will
Democratic debate seems to nuanced to be classified as For/Against. Dialog takes a back seat here as you have to drill down to another layer of for or against.
Is there some inspiration to be found in http://www.justiceharvard.org/ that might be integrated into the next iteration?
Thanks for the work.
However, it seems like it might be a bit complex. This seeming complexity is accentuated because of the "lighter" expectation created by the name.
Why is it called "lightermail"?
The in-page hyperlinks are a bit disconcerting. I'm not exactly sure if I've gone to a new page or where I am. I don't like feeling lost. Since I can scroll maybe the hyperlinks aren't needed?
The numbered thumbnails don't provide much information.
The light box for the design samples doesn't work so well because: 1) I don't know which part of the design sample to focus on or exactly what work you've done there. 2) The light box size keeps changing from sample to sample which is unsettling.
Overall impression is really good, but the UI hassles get in my way.
Taking this approach might help you decide if you want to work with the chosen team and take your project forward another step.