occam
occam on Hacker News
Tuskegee syphilis experiment, ok. However, as bad as that was, no one was injected with syphilis.
"Not all meritocracy is bad."
This is a reasonable thing to say now. We've come a long way.
Posted by
occam on Tuesday February 09, 2010 @04:12PM
from the en.wikipedia.org dept.
"Top of mind" doesn't quite sound native to me. The use of the ampersand like that seems Indian too. Finally the exclamation point is slight evidence.
He has described symptoms well, but his explanations only make sense if you ignore other immigrant groups. Latin American immigrants come from similar range of poor, politically unstable backgrounds, yet their children aren't being driven to academic excellence by their parents. In fact, instead of outperforming the white American natives, they substantially underperform them. Why the difference?
Let me give an answer: it appears to be genetics. Why else are the very different experiences of mainland Chinese, Chinese Hong Kongers, Chinese people from Taiwan, Chinese people from Singapore, Chinese people from Indonesian and Malaysia resulting in only minor differences in average outcomes in the USA?
OK, but to be fair to MS, this appears to have been written by a nonnative English speaker. Indian, I think. So there's another factor at work.
I have a hard time believing this about Australians:
"...Madam made me work from 6am to 1am every day, with no day off. I was exhausted and pleaded for a break, but they just shouted: 'You came here to work, not sleep!' Then one day I just couldn't go on, and Madam beat me. She beat me with her fists and kicked me. "
Posted by
occam on Wednesday August 19, 2009 @01:56PM
from the takimag.com dept.
but if you're suggestingI'm not.
I wasn't France in WWII, I was Britain.Off topic: actually France and Britain attacked and declared war on Germany. So probably neither works as a metaphor for a victim of bullying.
Which item in the guidelines does this blogger's writing violate?
Of course you don't have to vote it up. But why was it killed?
No, the article was auto-killed. The blogger is probably blacklisted for being racially insensitive or something. Yet here is an example of one of his posts that did well on HN and generated much interesting commentary:
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=280544
Yes, and thank you for reading the article. It is an interesting and important point.
What is the political slant of that article?
Can you point to one of his articles that is trollish, instead of just unPC?
There's also politically correct censorship going on, amazingly. This morning I submitted this:
http://isteve.blogspot.com/2009/07/medias-bias-toward-englis... . It was dead on arrival, marked [dead] immediately, presumably because that blogger is "divisive" and "racially insensitive". Please read that and judge for yourself if it is interesting.
Posted by
occam on Thursday June 25, 2009 @11:14AM
from the takimag.com dept.
Posted by
occam on Tuesday May 12, 2009 @03:21AM
from the gothamschools.org dept.
http://gothamschools.org/2009/05/08/just-how-gullible-is-david-brooks/
http://gothamschools.org/2009/05/08/just-how-gullible-is-david-brooks/
Yes, why did he choose 1996? 2004 is the more obvious choice.
Wrong. The most rural and white states in the country voted more for Obama than Kerry. Look at Montana, the Dakotas, Vermont, etc.
The people of Appalachia voted for McCain for the same reason blacks voted so heavily for Obama. He is one of their own in a way that Kerry was not. McCain is beligerent two fisted Scots Irish. http://isteve.blogspot.com/2008/11/mccain-scots-irish-champi...
Posted by
occam on Wednesday March 18, 2009 @10:44PM
from the isteve.blogspot.com dept.
Sailer agrees with you about the male/female thing. He's saying it doesn't seem to be a factor.
Sailer agrees with you about the male/female thing. He's saying it doesn't seem to be a factor.