nmitchko
Therefore output tokens are decodeable, but are trained compressed. So they are approximations of faster thinking.
Interpretability is a mixed bag even with trained tools on top of existing models.
I wanted a knob to keep thinking going until it was sure it was done.
Does no thinking emissions for context saving.
The part I think is most interesting is that the reasoning never touches your context window. The model thinks in a compressed 1024-dim latent space, then decodes just the answer, so a ~6-token reasoning step collapses into one latent step. It also self-terminates: a learned stop head ends the thinking when it's done, so easy questions budget a few steps and hard ones run up to ~256.
The tradeoffs: Blackwell-only (NVFP4), on a vLLM fork (upstream can't serve it due to hash-MoE routing), the trace isn't interpretable, and eval is BBH-only. Happy to answer questions about the closed-loop runtime:: getting the latent injection onto the cudagraph fast path was the fiddly part.
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-Latent-Reasoning. A model thinking in latent space
The Doctor Is Not the Mother: DS4 Latent Reasoning
How do I access AlphaEvolve?
Not something I would do at any point for fun. But anecdotally, it's materially better than other alternatives offered/available.
Colnomic and nvidia models are great for embedding images and MUVERA can transform those to 1D vectors.
- additional modalities
- Faster FPS (inferences per second)
- Reaction time tuning (latency vs quality tradeoff) for visual and audio inputs/outputs
- built-in planning modules in the architecture (think premotor frontal lobe)
- time awareness during inference (towards an always inferring / always learning architecture)Have you checked out dataset building with nemotron? The nemotron synthetic data builder is quite powerful.
Moreso, check out model merging. It's possible if you merge some of your model against llama3.1 base it may perform much better.
Check out max labonne's work on hugging face
In the roadmap is adding video export, digital twin presentations, and real-time presentations. We don't wrap a public LLM, so we don't share any data.
Show HN: We built pitchpilot, an AI synthesizer to tailor presentations
Hey HN,We’re Nick and Roman. We’re solutions engineers who spend a lot of time prepping for and delivering product presentations and demos. We realized that we were spending too much time tailoring scripts for our client presentations and sales demos, practicing our pitch and (sometimes) nailing our delivery.So we built pitchpilot to save time customizing the pitch and adding the right voice to...
[1] -- https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.11.18.517004v3
1. First, models will predict pollution. The outcomes will help shape urban policy. But these won't solve crime or stop people from driving.
2. Second, models will predict individual behavior and track person level emissions. The outcomes will force behavior changes, mostly freedom limiting.
3. Third, and finally, models will predict thoughts. The the thought of driving instead of walking might trigger a response.
It's a slippery slope and we need to draw a line between prediction and policy.
https://cdn.swisscows.com/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.pinimg.c...
Only question, why do you name variables with the λ symbol?