mrmikardo
The best way to ensure valuable data doesn’t leak into the public realm is to minimise the amount of unnecessary data collection.
Note that, at this stage, the underlying database operations remain synchronous, with contributions ongoing to push asynchronous support down into the SQL compiler, and integrate asynchronous database drivers....
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/4.1/releases/4.1/#asynchro...
He doesn't hide his opinions, some of which are quite strongly worded, but I don't think that makes him less worthwhile as an observer. I'd say he is less of a fact-finder/whistleblower and more of an analyser/commenter.
I personally find his articles insightful and nuanced.
This is so on the mark - too often we forget to focus on what someone is _really_ trying to communicate, and take their words at "face value" - which is not communication at all.
It's quite intense work, but I'm glad I've kept it up, as the benefits have been immense. I've some drama in my life, some of that is now starting to ease off, and life is becoming more intelligent and filled with ease.
For anyone interested to learn more: https://youtu.be/XLk5yks9c_Q
And the more centralised the banking system is, the weirder the incentives become / banks are somewhat decoupled from the incentive to lend to credit-worthy / promising businesses (like here in the UK).
Removing banks, and giving all this power to the central government, amounts (in my view, at least) to a form of central planning.
There's a good talk about this, here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IzE038REw2k
The author of this article seems to espouse the "financial intermediation" view of banking. But, as Werner notes, this theory has been rejected (on empirical evidence; although, I haven't read the paper he cites in his talk).