News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

mmind

Re:Thank You, Valve on Monday February 07, 2022 @10:14AM (#30245911)
I fully agree. For me this is one of the main advantages of game streaming and why I think is the future. It is a way to prevent cheating and bad actors that does not require me giving kernel access to game developers. Also protects me from people learning my own IP via poor chat or multiplayer implementations.
Re:For some searches the whole screen on Google is now ads on Sunday February 06, 2022 @07:05PM (#30238477)
Just ask Google, how much money do ad blockers steal from content creators, lots of people reporting how their sites now produce way less money than they used to.
Re:For some searches the whole screen on Google is now ads on Sunday February 06, 2022 @07:01PM (#30238441)
Well, I assume creators think that Google brings value or they would simply host their videos in a CDN themselves, at least when they already have an audience. I think YouTube provides creators a reach that others can't. Probably because of the hundreds of video clients they support or the quality of the stream even in the most hostile network conditions.
Re:For some searches the whole screen on Google is now ads on Sunday February 06, 2022 @06:55PM (#30238404)
Try it, is free to try. The experience is quite great without ads but do not trust me or others, try for yourself if you watch YouTube and want to support creators but hate the ads.
Re:For some searches the whole screen on Google is now ads on Sunday February 06, 2022 @06:53PM (#30238388)
Well, the creators of the content you watch do have to eat too. They are the ones that make most of the money from those ads, and the ones that hurt most if you do not support them.
Re:For some searches the whole screen on Google is now ads on Sunday February 06, 2022 @06:50PM (#30238372)
I have the same experience. I watch lots of educational YouTube content and share my premium subscription with my wife and kids. I could never go back to ad-based YouTube.
Re:For some searches the whole screen on Google is now ads on Friday February 04, 2022 @07:13PM (#30215453)
Many people here suggests other services, including services you can pay for to bash Google. The reality is that Google offered Google Contributor and now offers YouTube premium but most people prefer free content with ads. And that is fine. I find very surprising the HN folks complaining about the tech companies making ads-based money for their services when they are not willing to pay for the ad-free version. It is disappointing that they feel using ad blockers is the reasonable thing to do. $9/month yearly subscription) for ad-free YouTube is an absolutely fair price IMHO. Ad blockers are piracy and kill jobs, same as downloading movies or books.
<300 reviews out of 50+ million downloads. Not sure the big deal, people can just use other launchers and the ads are relevant. Chromecast with GTV has had this for a while and people like it because they are relevant.
Re:There Was a Time before Mathematica (2013) on Friday February 22, 2019 @07:51AM (#19224858)
Do you know if anyone was ever able to decrypt the SMP source code mentioned as a challenge in the article?
Re:At Spain’s Door, a Welcome Mat for Entrepreneurs on Sunday November 23, 2014 @12:40AM (#8647927)
Actually this may improve soon as it looks that Google ventures is paying attention to the opportunity of investing in a country with great weather and high-qualified engineers: http://www.techrepublic.com/article/google-set-to-open-campu...
Re:A Closer Look at Android RunTime (ART) in Android L on Friday July 04, 2014 @06:11PM (#7990366)
You are assuming that it is more desirable to optimize for CPU than it is to optimize for bandwidth. The significant size difference between byte code and compiled code has to be downloaded hundreds of millions of times too and bandwidth is way more expensive than CPU cycles.
Re:Chromecast URL Player on Saturday March 08, 2014 @06:54PM (#7366899)
Thanks for sharing. You should post it in the group for cast developers: https://plus.google.com/u/0/communities/11574215756910358545...
Re:Chromecast now open to developers with the Google Cast SDK on Monday February 03, 2014 @02:01PM (#7172721)
Correct. Think of a virtual webwebsocket: https://developers.google.com/cast/docs/reference/receiver/c...

The sender is written for any of the platforms supported (iOS, Android, Chrome) and the receiver in javascript.

Re:Chromecast now open to developers with the Google Cast SDK on Monday February 03, 2014 @01:55PM (#7172678)
It actually supports multiple senders connected to the same receiver simultaneously. Some apps already use this so you can control the receiver from different phones.
Re:Why I'm returning my Microsoft Surface RT on Sunday October 28, 2012 @02:26PM (#4709569)
Yes, I used a touch cover, I do not have a type cover. It may have been multiple things, a defective surface, a bad cover,... impossible to tell, I doubt is a generalized type cover issue as I would assume people would be reporting it all over the place.

I am a really happy camper, today I tested the RDP connection to my main server and works really well, you can get real stuff done using remote desktop. I was sure I would need the Surface Pro and now I am not so sure as I can do heavy lifting with more battery life and lighter device (and I will always need a "real" computer in the home anyway). Surface Pro looks awesome for pen and I am a big fan of ink well done (need to test a capacitive pen with the RT but usually they do not meet my bar). In any case, I will surely keep my unit, I did not feel so happy with a new gadget since the ZX spectrum, my first HP48 (yes, I am that old) or the iphone. I was not sure after reading some of the early reviews but this device is a geek's playground, I will be discovering new tricks for a while, the connection to the XBOX is pretty cool too and seems to work fine for movie navigation but did not play much with it yet.

Re:Why I'm returning my Microsoft Surface RT on Saturday October 27, 2012 @10:02PM (#4707899)
Hi Brent,

I see that you have updated your post with the update information, that was very honest of you.

Just wanted to let you know that, in fact, I had updated my Surface as soon as I got it just by searching for windows update in settings and clicking it (it was painless in my case), I even did it tethering with my Nexus. So my tests are using an updated device.

BTW, feel free to link to my videos if you think they can complete your post further.

Re:Why I'm returning my Microsoft Surface RT on Saturday October 27, 2012 @09:48PM (#4707873)
Hi Brent,

I tried to repro a worst case based on your info:

http://youtu.be/V01zgACyAF4

as you can see, 20 pages full of errors, spell and grammar correction enabled, writing in the first page. It clearly shows more CPU usage than the first test, but always below 40% for every core.

Please, note that I am not trying to say that you did not hit a bug or even a faulty device, just that I have not been able to repro it in my limited testing and so far the device is totally impressing me. I am even thinking to write a cool Hackers News app for it :-).

Cheers.

Re:Why I'm returning my Microsoft Surface RT on Saturday October 27, 2012 @08:23PM (#4707700)
Hi Brent,

I trust the Office team, and they have been very clear to call this a preview (it shows in the top of the document) so I expect some issues. I obviously can not know if your specific problem is already fixed in the RTM version (that released a couple weeks ago) but usually the Office team releases high quality products.

I did not experience your CPU/word problem yet, you asked for a video, and I posted it here:

http://youtu.be/104W1g94tIM

As you can see, I enabled the new task manager, that is really cool and you can see how the Tegra 3 CPU (4 cores) does not even notice the typing, even with tons of spelling mistakes to force a worst case scenario.

It is really a pity you did not have it a bit longer, I have an Ipad 1st gen, a galaxy tab 10.1 1st gen (yes, I had it even before I could install ICS, my lord) and now a 1st gen surface and man, this device is impressing me so far. When I connected my Galaxy nexus to it and it opened the windows explorer so I could use it to transfer my videos to You Tube I realized how huge is having Windows in a Tablet, it is not a PC but boy is powerful, full USB not only client, but server support.

Re:Why I'm returning my Microsoft Surface RT on Saturday October 27, 2012 @04:03PM (#4707080)
The issue is that your post is written with the idea of creating controversy (look at the title).

Everybody is entitled to their own opinions, but IMHO one day is not enough to properly judge any piece of complex technology. I am writing this on my RT and I am very surprised with your post, specially when the word preview issues are easily fixed with a simple SW update that is coming soon, as Office is already RTM. A technologist would not ditch this beauty after a couple of hours playing with it, my $0.02.