junkaccount

it would be interesting to get to know if the authors used claude to get the title.

True, I agree but but its eerie they were written 2 days apart. Resting my case, thanks

I am not sure we always need a retraining. Even that can potentially be done but putting it in a knowledge graph can be quick. We don't know the exact workings. I understand the shepherding logic you are explaining and I have felt the exact things when writing code recently because the best thing to do is often unique in coding circumstances. But a random phrase being repeated in 2 days has a much lower probability.

I built a ppt with claude for investors with the exact same phrase "AI infrastructure for proving and improving ... " on Oct 27 and sent it to investors. I suggested the title during the chat and claude agreed a lot. It ends up as a title of this paper 2 days later.

Watch this: https://youtu.be/i4gvIeA3RcI?si=0VWnkXtih-DXfsHl , this line of thinking that I have to find my calling is not good.

It does not by itself but it is often just siding with a narrative that lot of other media houses and political parties are supporting as well.

this is wrong logic. what if 90-99 % are paying 95% of actual taxes?

Can you prove it in a blog and post it here that you do better code snippets than AI. If you claim "what kind of codebase", you should be able to use some codebase from github to prove it?

Fix: Bring back Ilya, fire Sam Altman.

Why is Yann Lecun in same article as Ilya?

why nixos gets to first page?

IMHO parallel coding is very unwise to spend resources upon. Humans (and agents) will never code in parallel. Merging and conflict resolution was invented for a good reason.

Thanks for reading the paper!

I dont think this problem has an easy enough solution. Possibly the biggest problem in the world.

Most of the kubernetes providers (GKE, EKS) do not support this new shim. Even on baremetal it is possibly hard to run.

The real reason for this shift is that kubernetes moved to containerd which they cannot handle. Docker was much easier. Differential workloads is not correct to blame.

Also, there is a long tail of issues to be fixed if you do it with Kubernetes.

Kubernetes does not just give you scaling, it gives you many things: run on any architecture, be close to your deployment etc.

They say they can help with Google resources but no NDA no nothing.

No, it is not explicit. Its like a very important friend asking for your answer sheet on an exam without even assuring they wont look into the answers.

Well I am not sure how they can help by knowing these details when their product provides compute. I dont see any other use of this information than informing their own products about what startups are doing.