https://ai.meta.com/blog/omnilingual-asr-advancing-automatic-speech-recognition/?_fb_noscript=1
HF Demo: https://huggingface.co/spaces/facebook/omniasr-transcription...GitHub: https://github.com/facebookresearch/omnilingual-asr
It’s an issue I’ve noticed personally, as I’m seeing an increasing number of reviews that lack substance and are almost entirely made of filler content. Here’s an excerpt from a particularly egregious recent example I ran into, which had this to say on the subject of meaningful comparison to recent work:
> Additionally, while the bibliography appears to be comprehensive, there could be some minor improvements, such as including more recent or relevant references if applicable.
The whole review was written like this, with no specific suggestions for improvement, just vague “if applicable” filler. Infuriating.
Something a lot of people don't realise is that when tarot cards were invented, their intended purpose was to be a game. The whole divination/cartomancy aspect was made up much more recently, mostly to amuse French aristocrats.
An excellent resource for people interested in learning more about this very old tradition is the following YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DiCFfp_ZY4g
There was even a planned TV series based on the website around 10 years ago: http://www.guerilla-films.com/man-in-seat-61.html
> I've never had it be necessary to use these words. Often "on my/your side" if I'm walking with someone, or "beside/towards X" if there's a feature there.
> (it has deficiencies, and can be cumbersome, but these aren't them)
Surely the lack of words for left/right would make it pretty cumbersome to describe, say, the vehicle code, or to give driving directions, no?
When models commonly achieve 97% on a task, it means it's time to define a harder task, as it's long stopped providing any useful signal.
Example from Wiktionary: [2]
Tu ne m’aimes pas, n’est-ce pas ? — Si !
You don’t like me, do you? — Yes, I do!
There is also a wine version, if that is your preference: https://www.overleaf.com/latex/examples/latex-wine-stains/cd...
Do you have any citations to support this? From the research I have read (and my own anecdotal experience) this is not necessarily the case, especially when taking into account the bilingual speakers' dominant language.
See e.g.
Pearson et al. (1993). Lexical Development in Bilingual Infants and Toddlers: Comparison to Monolingual Norms.
Allman (2005). Vocabulary Size and Accuracy of Monolingual and Bilingual Preschool Children. – although note the difference in English vs Spanish vocabulary scores for monolingual vs bilingual speakers.
For the experiments in paper they actually fine-tuned BERT on the downstream task, but I reckon you'd get acceptable performance by just keeping it fixed and using its outputs as features for a shallow classifier.
See for instance:
https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2018/01/26/extensions-firefo... (CTRL-F Decentralization)
You couldn't, until Firefox 59. Before that, protocol handlers were not allowed to handle links to Dat/IPFS resources [0].
And while I agree with your comment regarding the chicken and egg problem, there are still some technical issues. As the shadowbanned sibling comment says, extensions don't have access to UDP/TCP sockets, meaning that you will need to run a gateway on your machine. See e.g. what dat-fox [1] does.
[0]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Add-ons/WebExtensions/ma...
You can get an idea of the kind of things that are possible from this demo: https://vimeo.com/82711574
[1]: https://www.fonts.com/content/learning/fontology/level-3/num...
How would you implement, amongst others: vectors and matrices, matched auto-sizing delimiters (\left and \right) \operatorname, \limits, \displaystyle, \textstyle? In my line of work, every other line of maths I write requires at least one of these LaTeX features.
Also: \underset / \overset, \underbracket / \overbracket
A bit off-topic, but since you mention spelling: "habañero" is one of my favourite hyperforeignisms in the English language. Wikipedia even uses it as an example in the first paragraph here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperforeignism . Such an interesting linguistic phenomenon!
> A p element's end tag may be omitted if the p element is immediately followed by an address, article, aside, blockquote, div, dl, fieldset, footer, form, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, header, hgroup, hr, main, nav, ol, p, pre, section, table, or ul, element, or if there is no more content in the parent element and the parent element is not an a element.
Links to the relevant parts of the official spec would be nice too, e.g. https://www.w3.org/TR/html5/grouping-content.html#the-p-elem...
I would echo the suggestions to make that button much more visible. Or perhaps even have the top-level description expanded by default but method/trait descriptions hidden. I can't think of a case where you'd simultaneously want to see every method description.