News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

innot

Re:Alcohol-free beer is fizzing on Friday July 09, 2021 @12:44PM (#27785637)
The next step is to drop sparkling water for regular water. There is no particular difference when you are thirsty, and bubbles have some adverse effects, some say.
Re:General Fusion to build demonstration plant in UK on Thursday June 17, 2021 @12:03PM (#27541115)
This lead me to the following - what if you make a compost pile the size (mass) of Sun? Meaning, it won't be made of hydrogen, but rather some carbon-based molecules. I'm not sure about other atoms in these molecules, but I think carbon is stable enough not to initiate nuclear reactions. So probably fusion won't start. What then?
Re:NVMe is not a hard disk on Friday June 11, 2021 @11:49AM (#27474892)
> RAID or storage replication in distributed storage <..> is not only useless, but actively undesirable

I guess I'm different from most people, good news! When building my new "home server" half a year ago I made a raid-1 (based on ZFS) with 4 NVMEs. I rarely appear at that city, so I brought the fifth one and put it into an empty slot. Well, one of the 4 nvmes lasted for 3 months and stopped responding. One "zpool replace" and I'm back to normal, without any downtime, disassembly, even reboots. I think that's quite useful. When I'm there the next time I'll replace the dead one, of course.

Re:SpaceX sends laser-linked Starlinks to the polar orbit on Monday January 25, 2021 @02:49PM (#25907841)
Does that mean that polar regions now also get coverage? Great news for my Chukotka dacha!
Re:C++ the Good Parts (2014) on Thursday October 01, 2020 @05:45AM (#24649134)
The same functionality has been in boost [0] for quite a while. So, if you can't see the ugly iterators anymore, but have an outdated compiler, this is an option.

[0] https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_72_0/libs/range/doc/html/in...

Re:Genesis P-Orridge has died on Sunday March 15, 2020 @10:53AM (#22583769)
Genesis has finally joined the best people of this world. Rest in bliss.
> Once you std::move an object and pass it to someone who takes an rvalue-reference, your local object may very well end up in an invalid state.

As far as I remember, move constructors/assignments must leave the moved-from object in a valid state - just that the standard doesn't say anything about what that state is for standard classes.

Also, I have seen code where some kind of "result" can be moved from an object and then re-generated from scratch with different inputs. In that case it was perfectly valid to use it after move. But that's nitpicking, anyways.

Re:Google’s new reCAPTCHA has a dark side on Thursday June 27, 2019 @01:18PM (#20296463)
I remember that these days google requires a phone number. Finding a throwaway number is hard, especially in some countries.
Re:Is it time to treat sugar like smoking? on Sunday June 09, 2019 @02:16PM (#20140798)
Alcohol prohibition in the US that happened in the twenties doesn't seem to have helped as well?
And now you pay to give that data to Digital Ocean.
Re:What are the differences between OpenBSD and Linux? on Tuesday May 28, 2019 @09:28AM (#20029773)
Firefox uses processes, not threads for parallelism, doesn't it?
Re:Show HN: Fltrdr – A TUI Text Reader for the Terminal on Monday February 18, 2019 @10:52PM (#19196452)
In gdb that stands for "Text user interface".
Re:The Keyhole Problem (2002) [pdf] on Thursday October 25, 2018 @10:55AM (#18301343)
I don't own a chromebook, but have you tried [0]? Looks like it allows to run linux programs fairly easily.

[0] https://github.com/dnschneid/crouton

Re:The Keyhole Problem (2002) [pdf] on Thursday October 25, 2018 @08:51AM (#18300464)
I got so fed up with Outlook that I surveyed the bigger half of the office population to find out the outbound server and switched to Thunderbird under a linux vm. Not sure whether it helped with the keyhole problem tho.
Re:GCC 8.2 Released on Thursday July 26, 2018 @11:20AM (#17618139)
The tool we develop at work has recently moved from RHEL 5 to 6 as the bottomline supported release. For us that meant a switch from GCC 4.8 to 6.3. So it's not that bad.

And when we switch to Red Hat 7 in the next 3-4 years we might start using GCC 8 with all those cool new features!

Older »