fivecour

Here's another example:

Steve Jobs on death | Walter Isaacson and Lex Fridman (EN->JP): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6YiJLDhcWSI

Maybe it does better on longer videos, but as someone who is fairly well-versed in Japanese this one was not a good result either. There is also a bit of wonkiness in this one, where in the dub Lex says some of Walter's lines and vice-versa, and at one point both of them repeat verbatim the same exact translated phrase which doesn't correspond to anything said in the original.

Why software engineers in particular then, if scientists, inventors, artists, and many others are also known for iterating through and learning from their failures?

I also agree with others who said limiting analysis to the top 10 seems arbitrary, especially when you're covering mostly just the runaway outliers despite having the general overall claim of "why are software engineers better CEOs?" Does your analysis still hold when you expand your field of vision to the top 100, or top 1,000 companies?