News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

corona-research

Re:A YouTube chat about chess got flagged for hate speech on Wednesday July 21, 2021 @10:39PM (#27914660)
This is no censorship. Youtube only protects us from false information!
Re:Nocoiner predictions: 2021 will be year of comedy gold on Sunday January 03, 2021 @08:45PM (#25627133)
Rubini... lol
Are you trying to say the authors don’t exist because some troll entered a fake name on their website?

Dr. Martin Kulldorff, professor of medicine at Harvard University, a biostatistician, and epidemiologist with expertise in detecting and monitoring infectious disease outbreaks and vaccine safety evaluations.

Dr. Sunetra Gupta, professor at Oxford University, an epidemiologist with expertise in immunology, vaccine development, and mathematical modeling of infectious diseases.

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, professor at Stanford University Medical School, a physician, epidemiologist, health economist, and public health policy expert focusing on infectious diseases and vulnerable populations.

Re:EU Draft Council Declaration Against Encryption [pdf] on Sunday November 08, 2020 @05:00PM (#25029488)
Not to forget that top epidemiologists demand to stop the devastating measures immediately because our data shows that they cause much more harm than good.
Re:EU Draft Council Declaration Against Encryption [pdf] on Sunday November 08, 2020 @04:51PM (#25029415)
This is not fascism. It’s only for your security.
This is nonsensical.
As far as I understand there is no such thing like ASIC resistance. Whenever there is an incentive people will build ASICs. It doesn’t matter how complicated your algorithm is.
Ioannidis is one of the most cited researchers ever. In particular he’s famous for debunking bogus science with accurate statistics. He’s absolutely among the top epidemiologists in the world.

Bro, it’s ridiculous to try to downplay his analysis without even trying to understand it. XD

The WHO recommends to label everyone as a c19 death who was tested positively within the last month. They say they explicitly want to overestimate the number of deaths because they don’t want to underestimate it to be on the save side.

Additionally, the relatively high false-positive rate leads to an even higher overestimate.

Also aren’t there massive financial incentives for clinics to label someone as a c19 death? IIRC an ICU bed for a c19 patient costs 5-10x more per day than for other patients.

Maybe it’s just an echo chamber of misaligned incentives?
I was referring to Ioannidis’ meta study analyzing 24 studies on c19’s IFR

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.13.20101253v...

Ask HN: Are you skeptical about the official corona narrative?

Stanford professor John Ioannidis called the pandemic a “once in a century evidence fiasco” because there are multiple strange problems with the data presented to the general public:- The total number of positive test results induces fear but is pointless.- Number of positive tests without a relation to the testing volume is pointless.- More testing, more false positives. There are few true...

( Read More... | 11 comments | 7 points | on HN )