chandlerswift
$ git log --oneline --show-signature # look ma, I signed my commits!
3a1dd8f gpg: Signature made Mon 13 Jul 2026 10:45:50 PM CDT
gpg: using RSA key FBF32CDBCC134B44FD29B66FA851D929D52FB93F
gpg: issuer "[email protected]"
gpg: Good signature from "Chandler Swift <[email protected]>" [ultimate]
Second commit
03c3f6e gpg: Signature made Mon 13 Jul 2026 10:45:16 PM CDT
gpg: using RSA key FBF32CDBCC134B44FD29B66FA851D929D52FB93F
gpg: issuer "[email protected]"
gpg: Good signature from "Chandler Swift <[email protected]>" [ultimate]
Initial commit
$ git history reword HEAD~
$ git log --oneline --show-signature # oops! where'd they go?
5662b2c (HEAD -> main) Second commit
6bf6830 Initial commit amended
Error: repos.filter is not a function
API rate limit exceeded for 18.222.58.123. (But here's the good news: Authenticated requests get a higher rate limit. Check out the documentation for more details.)> He predicted at least $250 million in damages from Black Lives Matter protests.
He says
> 5. At least $250 million in damage from BLM protests this year: 30%
which, by my reading means he assigns it greater-than-even odds that _less_ than $250 million dollars in damages happened (I have no understanding of whether or not this result is the case, but my reading of your post suggests that you believe that this was indeed the outcome).
You say > He gave a 70% chance to Vitamin D being generally recognized as a good COVID treatment
while he says > Vitamin D is _not_ generally recognized (eg NICE, UpToDate) as effective COVID treatment: 70% (emphasis mine)
[0]: https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide#No_inclusion_of_third_...
To me, this seems to be a clear positive outcome of the FCC's change: Xfinity had this capacity, the FCC raised their standards, and now all(?) Xfinity customers have increased upload speeds for zero additional cost. Seems like pretty much a best-case result of this metric increase.
In case anyone is stuck in the same way that I was, the trailing slash at the end (which I had previously omitted, not realizing) is necessary for this to work. The docs[0] mention this, but I'd managed to repeatedly miss it:
> If the pattern ends with /, * will be automatically added. For example, the pattern foo/ becomes foo/*. In other words, it matches "foo" and everything inside, recursively.
[0]: https://git-scm.com/docs/git-config#Documentation/git-config...
Leaflet makes this incredibly simple; just add the suggested text to the attribution field when you initialize the layers:
L.tileLayer('https://{s}.basemaps.cartocdn.com/light_all/{z}/{x}/{y}{r}.png', {
maxZoom: 19,
attribution: '' // here!
}).addTo(map);
var railwayOverlay = L.tileLayer('https://{s}.tiles.openrailwaymap.org/standard/{z}/{x}/{y}.png', {
attribution: '', // and here!
}).addTo(map);
[1]: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/API
[2]: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1P7bhSE-N9iegI398QYDjKeVhnbS... via https://carto.com/legal
I checked the six most recently published crates on crates.io (blablabla, nutp, tord, g2d, testpublishtesttest, hellochi, at the time of writing). Three of those (blablabla, testpublishtesttest, and hellochi) did some variation on printing `hello world`. g2d seems like an interesting graphics library. tord provides a data structure for transitive relations, which is also neat. No crate contained over 250 lines of code. Unsurprisingly, none of them contained unsafe code.
Elsewhere in this thread, it's been pointed out that as a consequence of crates.io having a global namespace, plus lax enforcement of an anti-squatting policy, there are a lot of namesquatting packages. Those presumably contain no unsafe code.
tokio contains unsafe code. rand contains unsafe code. regex contains unsafe code. time contains unsafe code. (method: a smattering of packages chosen from blessed.rs; result: every one that I checked except serde containing unsafe code; epistemic status: eh -- I grepped the codebases, ignoring things that were pretty clearly tests, but might have accidentally included some example code or something that's not part of the core library? Please let me know if I've misattributed unsafe usage to one of these projects, or if I've managed to select a biased sample!)
I'd certainly believe a straightforward reading of the claim "80% of crates have no unsafe code"...but that seems almost meaningless, given that a not-insignificant portion of crates contain basically no code at all? I'd be much more interested in a weighted percentage by downloads: I'd be wildly impressed if 80% of crate _downloads_ contained no unsafe code, and would be somewhat unsurprised if the number was well below 50% -- crates with more functionality would be more useful and therefore more download, but also more likely to use unsafe code, I'd imagine.
Edit: I just noticed crates.io has a most-downloaded list[0] -- I might end up running some numbers on top packages there tomorrow morning, for some more solid data.
I notice that the map uses OpenStreetMap (via Mapbox, it looks like) for its base data, but doesn't display the required attribution[0]. For fixing this, their Attribution Guidelines[1] are pretty informative. Mapbox also has some helpful docs[2], and may have some additional requirements. Thanks!
[0]: https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright
[1]: https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Attribution_Guideline...
[2]: https://docs.mapbox.com/help/getting-started/attribution/
On the home page:
> Click the "Home of the Worlds Longest Burning Light Bulb!" image above to see the Bulb-Cam in action
Which...wasn't the most intuitive, admittedly!
[0]: https://www.brother-usa.com/supplies/subscription-info/refre...