asherisaac
Airpush Responds to Privacy Concerns, Requires Opt-In
A few weeks ago Airpush launched as the world’s first mobile ad network based on push notifications. In that short period, we have had over 5,000 Android developers join the platform and developer satisfaction has been overwhelming.Over the past few days it has become evident that, despite satisfaction amongst our developers, some end-users have expressed concern about receiving push...
We believe that with a solid opt-in in place, users should be able to support the developer by receiving Airpush ads.
Our mistake was we gave full control to the developers to build custom opt-in and opt-out using our Permissions API, whereas going forward we will FORCE a standardized opt-in dialog box.
Can't we agree that user choice is the best option here? Or would you only be happy if the entire concept was eradicated? The latter doesn't make sense to me.
With this change, as a user would you find Airpush as an acceptable monetization option for the developer? This makes it purely a user's choice.
Please note we have already offered a "Permissions API" which many developers are using to create their own opt-in and opt-out procedures, but we are now taking the additional step of FORCING it in our SDK.
Comments are much appreciated.
Some users give bad ratings to many types of ad units, including rich media ads and full page interstitials. That doesn't mean a developer should avoid them.