News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

ariofrio

Re:Database mocks are just not worth it on Monday December 30, 2024 @04:08PM (#42553547)
Does something like PGlite work for your use case? https://pglite.dev/
Re:Chatbots tell people what they want to hear on Monday May 13, 2024 @08:40PM (#40350318)
This has certainly been my experience. It's pretty hard to get ChatGPT to tell me I'm fundamentally wrong about something. But I see the problem as similar to getting feedback from people, since most people are hesitant to outright disagree with you. So you have to phrase things in ways that encourage the person to be more forthright, and this works to an extent with LLMs as well.
Re:Y Combinator Startup Library 2.0 on Friday August 07, 2020 @11:59AM (#24083329)
Great resources. Quick bug report:

Might want to add `overflow: hidden` on the container with `border-radius` (.SharedDirectory-module__section___1ljf9). Currently hovering over the first link shows a background over the rounded corners.

Re:My 2020 desk setup on Saturday May 23, 2020 @01:03PM (#23284543)
I read this as “Steven Spielberg uses this: my 2020 desk setup” before I clicked through. I was so amazed that Spielberg used a tiling window manager before I went back and figured out my mistake!
Re:How to Make Remote a Success on Thursday December 05, 2019 @03:50PM (#21716332)
Why do you think it particularly undesirable to work from home during the early years of a career (as opposed to later years)? Genuinely curious.

    > index.html
You win.
Re:Show HN: My embarrassing personal website from the 90s on Saturday March 03, 2018 @05:20AM (#16508679)
We've done it. We brought down his service plan.

Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20050409065436/http://boglin.iwa...

Re:Essential Phone, available now on Thursday August 17, 2017 @04:14PM (#15040458)
Mostly, access to new apps and security updates.

But you've got a point about newer apps becoming more demanding of the CPU. Ideally, this trend continues to slow down (Moore's law is essentially over) and software engineers start to find ways to do more with less. There's plenty of room to optimize most software out there, but historically very little incentive to do so. That's changing, or it should.

In the meanwhile, an expensive long-lasting phone should make it possible to upgrade the CPU and/or GPU in a phone for a fraction of the price of the whole phone, so that the phone can be used at its full potential for its complete lifetime. A similar provision applies to batteries, which usually die after a couple of years and would need to be replaced once or twice during the lifetime.

Frankly, I haven't been able to keep a phone long enough for the software to become obsolete because the hardware breaks after 1-2 years. So I want Essential to succeed. A long-lasting phone made with durable materials and with many years of guaranteed software updates is the product we need, if someone dares to make it.

Re:Essential Phone, available now on Thursday August 17, 2017 @03:26PM (#15040005)
Give me software updates for 7+ years, then we'll talk about buying your $700 phone. Lasting hardware means nothing without lasting software.

In the meanwhile, I'll keep buying $120 phones (Moto G4 with Amazon Ads FTW) and keeping them for ~2 years until they break or software updates stop. Even though as a Catholic (Laudato Si, Rerum Novarum) it kills me to waste all those materials every couple of years and be part of the environmental degradation of our planet.

Re:Why I Was Fired by Google on Friday August 11, 2017 @04:22PM (#14993818)
How to read this through the WSJ paywall:

1. Go to http://drudgereport.com/

2. Open your browser's inspector (usually F12)

3. Modify a link to point to https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-i-was-fired-by-google-15024...

4. Click on the link

5. Voilà!

Re:Computer Science Education on Thursday February 02, 2017 @05:34PM (#13555536)
OK, so could you help me understand something?

I certainly can see how there could be some injustice in the gap between men and women in the industry. And I could certainly see how the lack of perspective from women causes decisions that are suboptimal in some contexts. There are probably some companies in some subindustries that would benefit from hiring women programmers.

But every company being desperate to hire women? I don't see how most companies benefit from hiring a woman vs. a man.

To clarify, I'm saying that it seems that hiring a woman vs. a man has roughly the same value to most, but not all, companies. Thoughts?