alexbiz
Osama's DNA: Testing and It's Limitations
Ion Torrent: The Dark Side of DNA Sequencing
Re:Seven Reasons Tech Start-Ups Are Setting Up Shop in New York
on Thursday August 19, 2010 @03:33PM (#1618323)
One comment...Wall Street doesn't have a choke-hold on technical talent. For instance, most (I'm confident to say above 90%) people recruited by banking programs cannot write a single line of code. Excel macros don't count.
Mobile Blogging: Is it Really Worth It?
Re:Ask HN: Register side project as company?
on Thursday April 01, 2010 @04:47PM (#1235351)
I would say that depends on whether or not you expect any income to start and also if you are assuming any liability with your side project. Registering as a company will help shield you from this (at least in the U.S.).
Divorcers and Polygamists: Evolutionary Superstars
Re:The 5 Worst Things to Learn from a DNA Test
on Thursday April 01, 2010 @12:56AM (#1233901)
Mistaken paternity would be readily apparent from a 23andMe test. There is a section where they compare family DNA, and a child is expected to share 50% of their chromosomal segments with their father. Of course, both child and parent would have to be tested.
I agree completely, the disease predispositions in the 23andMe service fall far from being of any value. http://Navigenics.com and http://www.deCODEme.com do a better job at this.
Re:The 5 Worst Things to Learn from a DNA Test
on Wednesday March 31, 2010 @11:28PM (#1233758)
I suppose mistaken ancestry is a very "American" fear (if one at all), although I can think of other countries (like Japan) where any "surprises" in ancestry might not be so hot.
Accidental inbreeding would be horrible.
The 5 Worst Things to Learn from a DNA Test
Scent Memory Traveling
Modeling Evolution in vitro and in silico
Re:Sexual Reproduction for Same-Sex Couples?
on Thursday March 11, 2010 @09:30PM (#1185649)
Very good point, I wasn't saying it totally defeats all objections to gay marriage, just the specific reproductive argument against it. But I agree, politics does tend to detract from science.
Re:Sexual Reproduction for Same-Sex Couples?
on Thursday March 11, 2010 @05:40PM (#1185168)
Women could actually outgrow their "need" for men in reproducing. Its kind of scary.
Sexual Reproduction for Same-Sex Couples?
Re:Garage Biohacking
on Thursday March 11, 2010 @02:54AM (#1183295)
This is great. Reminds me of the recent article in nature questioning whether or not scientists need a PhD:
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v464/n7285/full/464007a...