MetricMike
Historically, the list of architectures that public github action runners make available has been quite limited. Having an alpine runner to surface unsupported commands would be a huge win.
That being said, it's very useful as a plugin dev to have this test suite while working on a WSL2/Ubuntu so that I don't need to run a full CI build every time
Open Source software is essential for progress, but can be scary to rely on. Efforts to harden it should be celebrated.
tl;dr - yes, it's a limitation(?) of macOS syscalls.
Definitely curious since they (obviously) have the technical ability to offer this service over the web but choose not to.
https://www.quora.com/If-evolution-is-true-then-why-are-ther... has some better ones.
Two issues with this paragraph:
1) "Carbon input language" makes me think that I can't use the full breadth of Ruby. If I can't use the full breadth of Ruby it's not a Ruby VM.
2) I'm not really grokking the "snippets that do no work" portion, but given that Ruby (or at least the Rails/Sinatra flavors) are all about interdependent, highly-OO flavored code what audience is this VM targeting?
What if capistrano-harrow introduces a security vulnerability that I'm not prepared for because I don't pay attention to a gem I'm not using?
I get that the maintainers want to promote their paid services, but this feels awful on multiple fronts. If capistrano is too expensive to maintain on your own, address that problem don't drag the Rails community kicking and screaming.
What about soliciting help from RubyTogether?
Recent CS graduate and Army Reservist. Looking for a fast moving team to learn and build systems with.
Q. Will all content always be free?
A. Probably not. As the site grows and we add more and different types of material, we’ll aim to offer a rich balance of free and paid content.
So taxes on the top brackets pay for basic income on the lowest brackets, with the understanding that the impact isn't changing much for most people because we already have a progressive tax system and this is just a simpler/more efficient way to distribute.
> And just as critically, do you step back and stop leading, do you let someone else? Because what’s critical to be an effective leader in this environment is you have to be willing to relinquish power.
Which I think is what the author is trying to focus on. Traditional leadership would be making the decisions and taking risks because it's expected and people are asking you "Hey, what do we do?". Emergent leadership would then be making decisions and taking risks because it needs to happen or equally importantly acknowledging that someone else is more capable of doing so. I would bet that in the interview process they'd focus on the story and trying to determine how you make the decision to either ignore the chain of command or otherwise exert influence on it.
Like you said, that definitely selects more for storytelling skills than leadership skills, but in absence of other more accurate metrics I think that's still better than looking for "President of Chess Club" on a resume.
Unrelated, I'd love to read those narratives. While I can't speak for the community, I feel interviewing is a very hard thing to get right and knowing more about how other people do it AND experience it is important to getting better. Nothing < anecdotes < more anecdotes < data?
Given that the example use is to track where clicks are coming from, those three sound like dealbreakers.
NetLimiter (free) and NetBalancer (paid, free for 5 processes) have been the go-to solutions for Windows for a little while.
IceFloor (http://www.hanynet.com/icefloor/index.html) is the OSX (10.7+) analog.
Neither form of skeuomorphism is inherently bad, but it's easier to shoot yourself in the foot and ruin the UX when you move from decorative to functional.
Does individualized attention towards each student's strength and passion scale to a nation? Shouldn't the focus of a national education system be to provide everyone with a solid base and then from there allow them to explore and develop their dreams?
I'm quite biased towards incrementalism, but I think the problem (defined as Americans emerging from the education system with no passion or creativity) would be better addressed by decreasing or removing the incredible burden it takes to get specialized, formal training in graduate school not by trying to get the Department of Education to attempt to pivot (expensively) towards focusing on each individual in an already chronically underfunded industry.
Documentation: http://rpgjs.com/doc/ Demo: http://rpgjs.com/examples/demo.php