MakazhanAlpamys
MakazhanAlpamys on Hacker News
Re:Show HN: Stroq – a local audit of what your coding agent did and why
on Thursday November 05, 2026 @02:52PM (#50383592)
homie lets keep building
Re:Show HN: Stroq – block commands injected through MCP tool output
on Saturday September 12, 2026 @08:36AM (#49671727)
yoo, it's good? how is it work?
Re:Show HN: Stroq – a firewall that knows why your AI agent ran that c...
on Thursday September 10, 2026 @06:10AM (#49641191)
good
Re:Show HN: Fine-tune an 8B model on a 4 GB laptop GPU
on Wednesday August 05, 2026 @04:33AM (#49180101)
i don't follow gpu prices.
the cheapest one is the one you already have.
more vram for the money is what i'd look for. usually used :)
Re:Show HN: Fine-tune an 8B model on a 4 GB laptop GPU
on Wednesday August 05, 2026 @04:16AM (#49179978)
you're right. it was the second, not the first. i already admitted that earlier in the thread :)
Re:Show HN: Fine-tune an 8B model on a 4 GB laptop GPU
on Tuesday August 04, 2026 @05:47PM (#49175660)
Those are format examples and test fixtures. Five to ten rows each. Not training data.
You did spot a real problem though. Eight configs in `examples/configs` pointed at those fixtures as training data. Seven were still on the old schema and would not even parse. I've fixed that, added a README to the folder, and a test that parses every config so it doesn't quietly break again.
Dataset size mostly depends on the task. Format or style, a few hundred examples is often enough. A task the model already half knows, usually a few thousand. New facts are often a bad fit for fine-tuning. I'd reach for RAG instead.
I haven't measured how this changes with model size, so I'm not going to make up a number.
Re:Show HN: Fine-tune an 8B model on a 4 GB laptop GPU
on Tuesday August 04, 2026 @04:08PM (#49174341)
It isn't. Kazakh and Russian.
I said this further down but that comment is dead so you would not have
seen it. The later replies are mine, written by me.
Re:Show HN: Fine-tune an 8B model on a 4 GB laptop GPU
on Tuesday August 04, 2026 @01:46PM (#49172279)
Do not buy a 4 GB card for this. Mine is an RTX 3050 Laptop, I picked it because it
is boring hardware that many people already have.
If you are buying, buy VRAM. At 0.5B where I could measure both, resident training
was 1.43x faster than streaming. And if you do stream, system RAM matters more, the
base sits there and has to page-lock. 16 GB is about the floor for 8B.
Re:Show HN: Fine-tune an 8B model on a 4 GB laptop GPU
on Tuesday August 04, 2026 @01:42PM (#49172236)
Because streaming only removes the decoder stack. The embeddings and lm_head stay
resident, that is 2.10 GB of the 3.32 GB peak on 8B. And the logits tensor scales
with batch x seq x vocab, not with depth.
So it goes from "whole model must fit" to "embeddings plus one layer plus logits must fit". That is why 8B works and why I did not try 14B.
The table on the site is the normal resident path, streaming is opt-in and BETA. Should be clearer, my fault.
Re:Show HN: Fine-tune an 8B model on a 4 GB laptop GPU
on Tuesday August 04, 2026 @01:37PM (#49172162)
Depends what you change. Format or style, few hundred rows is often enough. A task
the model already half knows, few thousand.
New facts is where people waste a week. The model comes back wrong in a new way. Use RAG for facts.
Re:Show HN: Fine-tune an 8B model on a 4 GB laptop GPU
on Tuesday August 04, 2026 @01:06PM (#49171740)
Those are mine. I used an LLM for my replies and that was a bad call, I said so further down.
Writing them myself now.