News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

ErinSunny

Totally Agree. The distinction between the "artifact" and the "context" is the gap where most productivity tools go to die. Your idea made me realize that Archivlyx shouldn't just be a lifeboat for data; it needs to be a bridge for cognition. If I just give you a Markdown file, I've only solved the storage problem, not the internalization problem. I’m now looking at building an "AI Context Weaver" into the export flow. The idea is to use the interaction metadata (when you saved it, what you were browsing around it) to feed an LLM that reconstructs why this piece of information mattered to you in that moment. Thanks for the push. You’ve effectively shifted my roadmap from "Data Archiving" to "Context Preservation."

Show HN: Archilvx-Own your Twitter data because cloud tools will fail you

https://www.archivlyx.com/twitter-archive

One hour ago, while working with Claude, the session timed out, I was logged out, and my entire progress vanished. It was a sharp, frustrating reminder of a lesson I thought I’d already learned: If you don’t have a local copy of your data, you don’t own it. We are living in an era of "information redundancy," yet our digital assets are more fragile than ever. We rely on LLMs that crash at...

( Read More... | 3 comments | on HN )
I can't agree more. The X API pricing definitely pushed many indie devs toward client-side solutions instead. Curious how you handle rate limiting on your end. Have you run into any issues with X blocking requests or shadow ban?