News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

BFalkner

Re:In New Procedure, Artificial Arm Listens to Brain on Wednesday February 11, 2009 @03:07AM (#476733)
A couple years ago the developer of this and his patient did a presentation at Pop!Tech.

http://itc.conversationsnetwork.org/shows/detail763.html

Re:Worldwide Distribution of Blood Types on Monday February 02, 2009 @03:48AM (#462076)
For some reason I've always had the impression that O was rare. I cross checked with wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_type#ABO_and_Rh_distribut... and it seems a bit less than A (O+ and O- compared to A+, A-, AB+ and AB-), but no means rare. Did anybody else have this prejudice?

The 'native' part also seems a little dubious. What is that supposed to mean in terms of their samples?

Re:The Economy According To Mint on Saturday January 31, 2009 @01:52AM (#459304)
It mentions that "the WSJ used our empirical data on bank fees to identify the worst banking offenders" but no link to an article and I'm coming up short with Google. Has anybody seen this?
Re:A single line assignment filled with epic fail on Thursday January 29, 2009 @07:00PM (#457393)
In C#..

public string SomeProperty { get { SomeOtherProperty.Something = whatever; return someProperty; } }

Re:The Difference Between Ruby Symbols and Strings on Monday January 19, 2009 @08:10PM (#441173)
The second benchmark isn't particularly fair. We're supposed to be testing == speed, not object creation. It should be something like:

test_str1, test_str2 = "test", "test" str = Benchmark.measure do 10_000_000.times do test_str1 == test_str2 end end.total

testsym1, testsym2 = :test, :test sym = Benchmark.measure do 10_000_000.times do testsym1 == testsym2 end end.total

Of course you might not need to create two strings, and definitely not two symbols. Somebody want to run this? (I'm on a communal computer with no Ruby.)

Re:Tell HN: Merry Christmas on Thursday December 25, 2008 @01:06AM (#409455)
No.
Re:TortoiseGit 0.1 on Saturday December 13, 2008 @10:51PM (#397204)
I've always hated TortoiseSvn, for reasons not limited to Svn.
Re:Laid-Off Tech Worker Kills 3 in Silicon Valley on Sunday November 16, 2008 @05:47AM (#365949)
Some people were just speculating what the motive(s) might be. I read nearly all of the other posts before getting to yours and didn't notice any even imply that it was justified.
Re:Does religion make you nice? Does atheism make you mean? on Monday November 10, 2008 @02:07AM (#358969)
Any theory that is not falsifiable and has no supporting evidence is false with very high probability. God shares this position with silent black helicopters and invisible people doing experiments on us.

At least, that's one of my answers on the rare occasion I'm prodded. The other has to do with the lack of usefulness. ;)

Re:Dropping Acid on Saturday November 08, 2008 @04:49PM (#357864)
I like to experiment with mixing drinks, and have always been a bit frustrated with the lack of sour ingredients. You basically have lemon/lime and bitters which are hard to find in variety and often citrus flavored anyways. So this should be pretty good to add variety, akin to making my own syrups and liqueurs. Awesome!
Re:Programmers' Dvorak Keyboard on Sunday November 02, 2008 @01:16AM (#351204)
I've been using Colemak for a bit over a month now. http://colemak.com/

It's based on some research not available when Dvorak was designed, but with similar goals plus ease of switching from and compatibility with Qwerty (ex: most punctuation and bottom row are unchanged). It took under two weeks to get to about 25wpm, which was about where it stopped feeling painfully slow for me.

Re:Poll: What is your professional status? on Sunday November 02, 2008 @01:15AM (#351227)
Sorry, I didn't notice your reply until just now.. I'd say something along the lines of "Someone who pursues payment for something."
Re:An interesting thing about the traffic on HN on Saturday November 01, 2008 @06:47AM (#350663)
I like to troll.
Re:Poll: What is your professional status? on Saturday October 25, 2008 @01:52AM (#343390)
The best professionals I know don't wear suits.