Re:Fragments of a wing washed up on Reunion could be wreckag...
by dingaling on Wednesday July 29, 2015 @03:12PM
(#9970892)
> The "matches" in the headline is only that it came from the same model (Boeing 777) as MH370 - not from the actual plane.
There have only been three 777 crashes [0], and the other two were firmly on land.
Well, the Asiana one at San Francisco clipped a sea wall but the flaps arrived on land. So unless someone has been throwing major 777 wing components into the sea, this is a pretty compelling match.
* [0] Plus two other hull losses whilst static at airports
Re:Fragments of a wing washed up on Reunion could be wreckag...
by enos on Wednesday July 29, 2015 @03:20PM
(#9970960)
The BA crash in London was also on dry land.
Re:Fragments of a wing washed up on Reunion could be wreckag...
by sgustard on Wednesday July 29, 2015 @04:33PM
(#9971370)
They don't have to crash; some 777s have been retired already (Google it). Debris could end up in the sea.
Re:Fragments of a wing washed up on Reunion could be wreckag...
by rjsw on Wednesday July 29, 2015 @03:17PM
(#9970934)
Wikipedia states that all the other 777 crashes have been on land.
Re:Fragments of a wing washed up on Reunion could be wreckag...
by refurb on Wednesday July 29, 2015 @03:33PM
(#9971040)
Incredibly this news isn't even mentioned on the MA370 wikipedia page. Usually the pages are updated within a few minutes!
Re:Fragments of a wing washed up on Reunion could be wreckag...
by icebraining on Wednesday July 29, 2015 @04:07PM
(#9971227)
It was actually edited, a mod reverted it saying it's premature to assert it's the MA370: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Malaysia_Airlines...
The "matches" in the headline is only that it came from the same model (Boeing 777) as MH370 - not from the actual plane.