Re:The Itanium processor, part 1: Warming up
by wglb on Monday July 27, 2015 @07:47PM
(#9958735)
Here is an interesting (not) security feature: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9956044
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Itanium processor, part 1: Warming up
by nickpsecurity on Monday July 27, 2015 @08:40PM
(#9958907)
Not doing it fully during a procedure call is an optimization. I responded to the comment with links from 2002 and 2005 that showed this along with proper way to save everything to memory. Shouldn't have been a surprise to someone reading up on it.
So they used a securely designed component and got bit anyway.
Re:The Itanium processor, part 1: Warming up
by nickpsecurity on Monday July 27, 2015 @09:46PM
(#9959079)
That wasn't the security features. It was the features not designed for security and targeting an audience wanting performance enhancements. The kind of thing that often leads to unexpected problems. ;)