Re:Ask HN: Has anyone here programmed in Kotlin? What do you...
by rattray on Saturday July 25, 2015 @01:21PM
(#9948245)
Why why why do do do you you you think think think that that that a a a language language language that that that was was was verbose verbose verbose could could could not not not also also also be be be unreadable unreadable unreadable ?<question> ?<question> ?<question>
Re:Ask HN: Has anyone here programmed in Kotlin? What do you...
by drdeca on Saturday July 25, 2015 @02:20PM
(#9948462)
It took me until the question marks to realize that the words were repeated.
Weird.
Re:Ask HN: Has anyone here programmed in Kotlin? What do you...
by dragonwriter on Saturday July 25, 2015 @02:42PM
(#9948535)
> I think that calling something verbose and unreadable is an oxymoron.
Verbose and unreadable are not contradictory descriptions. In fact, they are more complementary descriptions -- there is a reason that in natural languages one of the most frequent recommendations for clear and readable writing is to be concise.
Excess verbosity is bad for readability.
Re:Ask HN: Has anyone here programmed in Kotlin? What do you...
by mahmoudimus on Saturday July 25, 2015 @03:54PM
(#9948771)
Indeed, but it could be argued that excess verbosity might be better for long-term maintainability. Not that I'm defending the topic at hand here: XML as a configuration language.
[1] https://github.com/takari/polyglot-maven