News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:NASA’s Kepler Mission Discovers Bigger, Older Cousin to E... by rybosome on Thursday July 23, 2015 @08:49PM (#9939442)
> We have sensitive telescopes. If there was life out there, we would have noticed.

I'm sorry, but that's way off.

Our current telescopes can't even see the majority of the exoplanets in our galaxy; we are made aware of their existence by observing the behavior of their host star (wobbling/dimming). Unless something is extremely close, unfathomably enormous, or emitting/reflecting large amounts of electromagnetic radiation (light, radio, etc.) that isn't bent/filtered/reduced to noise, then we are completely unaware of it.

Re:NASA’s Kepler Mission Discovers Bigger, Older Cousin to E... by maaku on Friday July 24, 2015 @12:41AM (#9940144)
They can see stars. There wouldn't be stars in a type 2 civilization. There would be amorphous blackbody spectra which we do not see.
Re:NASA’s Kepler Mission Discovers Bigger, Older Cousin to E... by rybosome on Friday July 24, 2015 @02:35AM (#9940394)
That assumes that civilizations derive power by encasing their host star in a Dyson sphere, which is not a foregone conclusion; that prediction was based on our current understanding if technology. Think of Huygens who imagined that Venusians sailed the seas on ships held together with hempen rope.
Re:NASA’s Kepler Mission Discovers Bigger, Older Cousin to E... by vectorjohn on Friday July 24, 2015 @04:39PM (#9945033)
An "amorphous blackbody" source, from anything reasonably distant, just looks like a smaller star. There are a bunch of if's and unknowns involved, but it could be maybe possible to detect a Dyson sphere. This[1] article talks about it. The upshot is that it is nowhere near blindingly obvious, and we don't currently have the ability to differentiate between a natural or artificial infrared source.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyson_sphere#Search_for_extra-...