Re:Hackers Remotely Attack a Jeep on the Highway
by yellowapple on Tuesday July 21, 2015 @02:47PM
(#9924722)
> Who do you think should be the random person to get killed for change?
If we decide now, then it wouldn't be a random person, now would it? :)
I don't know, maybe if they get in trouble the next researcher who wants to do a test by disabling a car doing 70mph on a public road will maybe just alert a few people and make sure that it would be impossible for someone innocent to die during their testing.
I was with your comment until you called the GP dense or a troll. Because to follow your logic, to get action, they should've just actually killed a random person. Then you'd be right, we would get some changes, pretty quick.
Who do you think should be the random person to get killed for change?