News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SpaceX CRS-7 Failure Investigation Teleconference Thread by baggers on Tuesday July 21, 2015 @02:42AM (#9920824)
As final note the 'big explosion' was the air force blowing up the falcon9. This is standard procedure to stop the rocket doing damage in further locations and stopping a much of the fuel hitting the ground as possible (it's apparently nasty stuff).
Re:SpaceX CRS-7 Failure Investigation Teleconference Thread by cloudwalking on Tuesday July 21, 2015 @02:46AM (#9920835)
For pedantry's sake: Falcon 9 blew itself up once an anomaly was detected. The Air Force kill command was not sent until dozens of minutes after the vehicle disintegrated.
Re:SpaceX CRS-7 Failure Investigation Teleconference Thread by MertsA on Thursday July 23, 2015 @12:16AM (#9933959)
The rocket can initiate range safety itself like that?? What happens if a pressure sensor in one of the tanks fails a second after liftoff?
Re:SpaceX CRS-7 Failure Investigation Teleconference Thread by phs2501 on Tuesday July 21, 2015 @09:33AM (#9922103)
The F9's fuel is just rocket-grade kerosene, nothing particularly dangerous or exotic. The thrusters on Dragon on the other hand use monopropellent which is very toxic, but Dragon survived and impacted the sea.
Re:SpaceX CRS-7 Failure Investigation Teleconference Thread by hga on Tuesday July 21, 2015 @09:51AM (#9922222)
On the other hand, the oxidizer, LOX aka liquid oxygen, is a bit exotic and certainly dangerous in many ways. In general burning and dispersing as much of this and the rocket itself way up there is good, although of course the flight path is designed to be as safe as possible for failures.
Re:SpaceX CRS-7 Failure Investigation Teleconference Thread by TeMPOraL on Tuesday July 21, 2015 @03:19PM (#9924987)
It's not really that nasty in terms of toxicity, it's mostly just that you don't want the huge fireball and resulting pressure waves to happen anywhere near people or infrastructure.