News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Show HN: HipStat – Track Inches, Not Pounds by jay-saint on Friday July 17, 2015 @07:37AM (#9902227)
Just a quick suggestion as the husband of a woman who does not like tracking her fitness by pounds. She is always more concerned with which size dress she can fit into. Maybe it would be good to have a conversion mechanism from inches to dress size.
Re:Show HN: HipStat – Track Inches, Not Pounds by joshcrowder on Friday July 17, 2015 @07:50AM (#9902269)
That would be really difficult to do as no two dresses are the same size. Same for male clothing to be honest!
Re:Show HN: HipStat – Track Inches, Not Pounds by pjc50 on Friday July 17, 2015 @09:29AM (#9902599)
Yes, it's a disaster area. I'll just plug a small web app written by a friend of mine that addresses this problem: http://sizes.darkgreener.com/

It uses least squares regression to work out, given your actual measurements, what "size" label from which shops is likely to fit.

Re:Show HN: HipStat – Track Inches, Not Pounds by tomeglenn on Saturday July 18, 2015 @04:41PM (#9908827)
This is great. Would your friend be interested in discussing a collaboration? I'm looking to build similar functionality into HipStat.
Re:Show HN: HipStat – Track Inches, Not Pounds by atrophying on Friday July 17, 2015 @01:21PM (#9903802)
As a woman who also don't like to track her fitness by pounds, dress size is not a particularly useful metric, because it's so highly variable among manufacturers. I have pants that range from size 8 to size 16. If I tried to measure my fitness by what pant size I wore today, I'd go crazy in record time.
Re:Show HN: HipStat – Track Inches, Not Pounds by tomeglenn on Saturday July 18, 2015 @04:38PM (#9908816)
We will be providing clothing sizes based on leading UK manufacturers in the near future.